Thinking hard together: The long and short of collaborative idea generation in scientific inquiry

Hao Chuan Wang*, Carolyn P. Rosé, Yue Cui, Chun Yen Chang, Chun Chieh Huang, Tsai Yen Li

*此作品的通信作者

研究成果: 書貢獻/報告類型會議論文篇章

13 引文 斯高帕斯(Scopus)

摘要

Idea generation is a cognitive process that plays a central role in inquiry learning tasks. This paper presents results from a controlled experiment in which we investigate the affect on productivity and learning from doing idea generation tasks individually versus in pairs, with versus without automatic support from a virtual brainstorming agent called VIBRANT. Our finding is that individuals brainstorming with VIBRANT produced more ideas than individuals who brainstormed with a human peer. However, an additional finding is that while brainstorming in pairs lead to short term process losses in terms of idea generation, with a corresponding reduction in learning in terms of pre to post test gains, it produced a productivity gain for a subsequent distinct individual inquiry task. Furthermore, automatically generated feedback from VIBRANT improved learning during idea generation but did not mitigate the process losses that were associated with reduced learning in the pairs conditions.

原文英語
主出版物標題CSCL 2007 - Computer Supported Collaborative Learning Conference 2007
主出版物子標題Mice, Minds, and Society
頁面753-762
頁數10
版本PART 2
出版狀態已發佈 - 2007 十二月 1

出版系列

名字Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning Conference, CSCL
號碼PART 2
8
ISSN(列印)1573-4552

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • 人機介面
  • 教育

指紋

深入研究「Thinking hard together: The long and short of collaborative idea generation in scientific inquiry」主題。共同形成了獨特的指紋。

引用此