TY - JOUR
T1 - The affordances and limitations of collaborative science simulations
T2 - The analysis from multiple evidences
AU - Liu, Chen Chung
AU - Hsieh, I. Chen
AU - Wen, Cai Ting
AU - Chang, Ming Hua
AU - Fan Chiang, Shih Hsun
AU - Tsai, Meng Jung
AU - Chang, Chia Jung
AU - Hwang, Fu-Kwun
N1 - Funding Information:
This research was partially funded by the Ministry of Science and Technology, Taiwan under contract numbers 109-2511-H-008 -006 -MY3 , 108-2811-H-008 -506 -, 107-2511-H-008 -003 -MY3 .This study also thanks to the eye-tracking techniques provided by MJ's CELL Research Team sponsored by MOST 106-2511-S-003-064-MY3 and the ‘ Institute for Research Excellence in Learning Sciences ’ of NTNU sponsored by the Ministry of Education (MOE) in Taiwan.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2020 Elsevier Ltd
PY - 2021/1
Y1 - 2021/1
N2 - Recent advancements in Web and HTML5 techniques have made collaborative simulations able to support a shared workspace and more synchronous collaboration in a single simulation. However, previous studies show divergent findings regarding the effects of the new features of collaborative simulations. To better understand the affordances and limitations of collaborative simulations, this study analyzed how 64 students learned in two different collaborative learning settings: individual-based simulation and collaborative simulation. To better reveal how students attended to different parts of the simulation, the researchers collected eye movement data and analyzed students’ discourse, perceptions of collaboration and learning performance. The findings revealed that the two groups demonstrated similar levels of learning gains. However, the students who used the collaborative simulation displayed lower levels and less frequency of individual attention to the simulation than those using the individual-based simulation. However, the joint attention and discourse analysis suggests that students learning with the collaborative simulation are more likely to engage in effective collaborative learning while demonstrating more constructive discourse threads than those using the individual-based simulation. The findings support that the collaborative simulations transformed the learning experience into a cohesive collaborative learning process. This study also found that the relationship between the joint attention and the discourse features as well as the perceived collaborative experience are not decisive but are influenced by the features of the collaborative learning environment. This article discusses the implications of the use of collaborative simulations and eye movement for supporting collaborative learning, and addresses the direction for future studies.
AB - Recent advancements in Web and HTML5 techniques have made collaborative simulations able to support a shared workspace and more synchronous collaboration in a single simulation. However, previous studies show divergent findings regarding the effects of the new features of collaborative simulations. To better understand the affordances and limitations of collaborative simulations, this study analyzed how 64 students learned in two different collaborative learning settings: individual-based simulation and collaborative simulation. To better reveal how students attended to different parts of the simulation, the researchers collected eye movement data and analyzed students’ discourse, perceptions of collaboration and learning performance. The findings revealed that the two groups demonstrated similar levels of learning gains. However, the students who used the collaborative simulation displayed lower levels and less frequency of individual attention to the simulation than those using the individual-based simulation. However, the joint attention and discourse analysis suggests that students learning with the collaborative simulation are more likely to engage in effective collaborative learning while demonstrating more constructive discourse threads than those using the individual-based simulation. The findings support that the collaborative simulations transformed the learning experience into a cohesive collaborative learning process. This study also found that the relationship between the joint attention and the discourse features as well as the perceived collaborative experience are not decisive but are influenced by the features of the collaborative learning environment. This article discusses the implications of the use of collaborative simulations and eye movement for supporting collaborative learning, and addresses the direction for future studies.
KW - Collaborative learning
KW - Collaborative simulation
KW - Eye-tracking
KW - Science learning
KW - Simulation
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85092292698&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85092292698&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.compedu.2020.104029
DO - 10.1016/j.compedu.2020.104029
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85092292698
VL - 160
JO - Computers and Education
JF - Computers and Education
SN - 0360-1315
M1 - 104029
ER -