摘要
This discussion article addresses issues related to expansion of the Wechsler model from four to five factors; multiple broad CHC abilities measured by the Arithmetic subtest; advantages and disadvantages of including complex tasks requiring integration of multiple broad abilities when measuring intelligence; limitations of factor analysis, which constrain test developers to creating specific broad and narrow abilities as opposed to integrative tasks; implications from brain imaging research showing the critical role of neurological pathways that integrate brain regions; close relationship of the fluid reasoning factor to g, and the inadequacies of factor analytically driven statistical definitions of g in the development of improved models of intelligence. In this rejoinder to the commentaries in this special issue on structural models of the WAIS-IV and WISC-IV, the advantages and disadvantages of Schmid-Leiman's transformation, which removes the effects of g on the broad abilities, and the use of nested or bifactor models in evaluating models of intelligence are also discussed.
| 原文 | 英語 |
|---|---|
| 頁(從 - 到) | 235-243 |
| 頁數 | 9 |
| 期刊 | Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment |
| 卷 | 31 |
| 發行號 | 2 |
| DOIs | |
| 出版狀態 | 已發佈 - 2013 4月 |
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- 教育
- 臨床心理學
- 一般心理學
指紋
深入研究「Technical and Practical Issues in the Structure and Clinical Invariance of the Wechsler Scales: A Rejoinder to Commentaries」主題。共同形成了獨特的指紋。引用此
- APA
- Standard
- Harvard
- Vancouver
- Author
- BIBTEX
- RIS