Social Validity of Evidence-Based Practices and Emerging Interventions in Autism

Kevin Callahan, Heather L. Hughes, Smita Mehta, Karen A. Toussaint, Susan M. Nichols, Phoenix S. Ma, Metehan Kutlu, Hui Ting Wang

研究成果: 雜誌貢獻文章

22 引文 斯高帕斯(Scopus)


Although social validation of the goals, methods, and outcomes of evidence-based practices (EBPs) in autism treatment is a significant factor in their selection and effective use, EBPs are typically identified on the basis of the technical soundness of research without consideration of social validity. The authors investigated EBPs and emerging treatments identified by the National Autism Center (NAC) and National Professional Development Center on Autism Spectrum Disorders (NPDC) to determine which interventions have evidence of social validity, and the types of social validation addressed. A review of 828 articles cited by the NAC and NPDC determined that only 221 articles (26.7%) demonstrated direct evidence of the measurement of social validation. Of seven social validity categories analyzed, only consumer satisfaction, clinically significant behavioral change, and socially important dependent variables were consistently reported. A list of EBPs with varying levels of social and empirical validation is presented, and implications for future research are discussed.

頁(從 - 到)188-197
期刊Focus on Autism and Other Developmental Disabilities
出版狀態已發佈 - 2017 九月 1

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Pediatrics, Perinatology, and Child Health
  • Neurology
  • Clinical Neurology
  • Cognitive Neuroscience
  • Psychiatry and Mental health

指紋 深入研究「Social Validity of Evidence-Based Practices and Emerging Interventions in Autism」主題。共同形成了獨特的指紋。

  • 引用此