TY - JOUR
T1 - Semantic relationships in mandarin speech errors
AU - Wan, I. Ping
AU - Ting, Jen
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2019, Crane Publishing Co.. All rights reserved.
PY - 2019
Y1 - 2019
N2 - This paper investigates various patterns in a corpus of naturally-occurring lexical substitution speech errors to show how Mandarin speakers produce such lexical items and how they relate to the lexical-semantic relationships in Mandarin lexicon. Target-error pairs often share similar semantic features or are semantically-related associates and can be categorized into general taxonomies of semantic relatedness. A coordinate relationship is the most common type, followed by association, and contrastive is the least common type. These findings show that two lexical items are related by sharing a number of semantic features or sharing values on these features to the same level of specificity in the context. Lexical errors in Mandarin confirm some general findings in other relevant cross-linguistic studies, suggesting that the semantic links between two lemmas in the lexicon have caused the error. The error distributions in the Mandarin corpus suggest that lexical selection occurs independently in models of lexical production. The data confirm the description of the formulation stage in the context of psycholinguistic models of sentence production (Garrett, 1975, 1982, 1984; Levelt, 1989; Dell, 1986, 1988).
AB - This paper investigates various patterns in a corpus of naturally-occurring lexical substitution speech errors to show how Mandarin speakers produce such lexical items and how they relate to the lexical-semantic relationships in Mandarin lexicon. Target-error pairs often share similar semantic features or are semantically-related associates and can be categorized into general taxonomies of semantic relatedness. A coordinate relationship is the most common type, followed by association, and contrastive is the least common type. These findings show that two lexical items are related by sharing a number of semantic features or sharing values on these features to the same level of specificity in the context. Lexical errors in Mandarin confirm some general findings in other relevant cross-linguistic studies, suggesting that the semantic links between two lemmas in the lexicon have caused the error. The error distributions in the Mandarin corpus suggest that lexical selection occurs independently in models of lexical production. The data confirm the description of the formulation stage in the context of psycholinguistic models of sentence production (Garrett, 1975, 1982, 1984; Levelt, 1989; Dell, 1986, 1988).
KW - Lexical substitution errors
KW - Mandarin
KW - Semantic relations
KW - Speech errors
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85073472439&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85073472439&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.6519/TJL.201907_17(2).0002
DO - 10.6519/TJL.201907_17(2).0002
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85073472439
SN - 1729-4649
VL - 17
SP - 33
EP - 66
JO - Taiwan Journal of Linguistics
JF - Taiwan Journal of Linguistics
IS - 2
ER -