Proximate units in word production: Phonological encoding begins with syllables in Mandarin Chinese but with segments in English

Padraig G. O'Seaghdha, Jenn-Yeu Chen, Train Min Chen

研究成果: 雜誌貢獻文章

79 引文 (Scopus)

摘要

In Mandarin Chinese, speakers benefit from fore-knowledge of what the first syllable but not of what the first phonemic segment of a disyllabic word will be (Chen, Chen, & Dell, 2002), contrasting with findings in English, Dutch, and other Indo-European languages, and challenging the generality of current theories of word production. In this article, we extend the evidence for the language difference by showing that failure to prepare onsets in Mandarin (Experiment 1) applies even to simple monosyllables (Experiments 2-4), and confirm the contrast with English for comparable materials (Experiments 5 and 6). We also provide new evidence that Mandarin speakers do reliably prepare tonally unspecified phonological syllables (Experiment 7). To account for these patterns, we propose a language general proximate units principle whereby intentional preparation for speech as well as phonological-lexical coordination are grounded at the first phonological level below the word at which explicit unit selection occurs. The language difference arises because syllables are proximate units in Mandarin Chinese, whereas segments are proximate in English and other Indo-European languages. The proximate units perspective reconciles the aspiration toward a language general account of word production with the reality of substantial cross-linguistic differences.

原文英語
頁(從 - 到)282-302
頁數21
期刊Cognition
115
發行號2
DOIs
出版狀態已發佈 - 2010 五月 1

指紋

Language
language
experiment
Linguistics
evidence
Experiment
Word Production
Phonological Encoding
Mandarin Chinese
linguistics
Indo-European Languages
Language Differences

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology
  • Language and Linguistics
  • Developmental and Educational Psychology
  • Linguistics and Language
  • Cognitive Neuroscience

引用此文

Proximate units in word production : Phonological encoding begins with syllables in Mandarin Chinese but with segments in English. / O'Seaghdha, Padraig G.; Chen, Jenn-Yeu; Chen, Train Min.

於: Cognition, 卷 115, 編號 2, 01.05.2010, p. 282-302.

研究成果: 雜誌貢獻文章

@article{b84857d1dd4f47acbf848c60d064e348,
title = "Proximate units in word production: Phonological encoding begins with syllables in Mandarin Chinese but with segments in English",
abstract = "In Mandarin Chinese, speakers benefit from fore-knowledge of what the first syllable but not of what the first phonemic segment of a disyllabic word will be (Chen, Chen, & Dell, 2002), contrasting with findings in English, Dutch, and other Indo-European languages, and challenging the generality of current theories of word production. In this article, we extend the evidence for the language difference by showing that failure to prepare onsets in Mandarin (Experiment 1) applies even to simple monosyllables (Experiments 2-4), and confirm the contrast with English for comparable materials (Experiments 5 and 6). We also provide new evidence that Mandarin speakers do reliably prepare tonally unspecified phonological syllables (Experiment 7). To account for these patterns, we propose a language general proximate units principle whereby intentional preparation for speech as well as phonological-lexical coordination are grounded at the first phonological level below the word at which explicit unit selection occurs. The language difference arises because syllables are proximate units in Mandarin Chinese, whereas segments are proximate in English and other Indo-European languages. The proximate units perspective reconciles the aspiration toward a language general account of word production with the reality of substantial cross-linguistic differences.",
keywords = "Cross-linguistic analysis, Phonological encoding, Proximate units, Speech planning, Syllable production",
author = "O'Seaghdha, {Padraig G.} and Jenn-Yeu Chen and Chen, {Train Min}",
year = "2010",
month = "5",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.cognition.2010.01.001",
language = "English",
volume = "115",
pages = "282--302",
journal = "Cognition",
issn = "0010-0277",
publisher = "Elsevier",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Proximate units in word production

T2 - Phonological encoding begins with syllables in Mandarin Chinese but with segments in English

AU - O'Seaghdha, Padraig G.

AU - Chen, Jenn-Yeu

AU - Chen, Train Min

PY - 2010/5/1

Y1 - 2010/5/1

N2 - In Mandarin Chinese, speakers benefit from fore-knowledge of what the first syllable but not of what the first phonemic segment of a disyllabic word will be (Chen, Chen, & Dell, 2002), contrasting with findings in English, Dutch, and other Indo-European languages, and challenging the generality of current theories of word production. In this article, we extend the evidence for the language difference by showing that failure to prepare onsets in Mandarin (Experiment 1) applies even to simple monosyllables (Experiments 2-4), and confirm the contrast with English for comparable materials (Experiments 5 and 6). We also provide new evidence that Mandarin speakers do reliably prepare tonally unspecified phonological syllables (Experiment 7). To account for these patterns, we propose a language general proximate units principle whereby intentional preparation for speech as well as phonological-lexical coordination are grounded at the first phonological level below the word at which explicit unit selection occurs. The language difference arises because syllables are proximate units in Mandarin Chinese, whereas segments are proximate in English and other Indo-European languages. The proximate units perspective reconciles the aspiration toward a language general account of word production with the reality of substantial cross-linguistic differences.

AB - In Mandarin Chinese, speakers benefit from fore-knowledge of what the first syllable but not of what the first phonemic segment of a disyllabic word will be (Chen, Chen, & Dell, 2002), contrasting with findings in English, Dutch, and other Indo-European languages, and challenging the generality of current theories of word production. In this article, we extend the evidence for the language difference by showing that failure to prepare onsets in Mandarin (Experiment 1) applies even to simple monosyllables (Experiments 2-4), and confirm the contrast with English for comparable materials (Experiments 5 and 6). We also provide new evidence that Mandarin speakers do reliably prepare tonally unspecified phonological syllables (Experiment 7). To account for these patterns, we propose a language general proximate units principle whereby intentional preparation for speech as well as phonological-lexical coordination are grounded at the first phonological level below the word at which explicit unit selection occurs. The language difference arises because syllables are proximate units in Mandarin Chinese, whereas segments are proximate in English and other Indo-European languages. The proximate units perspective reconciles the aspiration toward a language general account of word production with the reality of substantial cross-linguistic differences.

KW - Cross-linguistic analysis

KW - Phonological encoding

KW - Proximate units

KW - Speech planning

KW - Syllable production

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=77649179858&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=77649179858&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.cognition.2010.01.001

DO - 10.1016/j.cognition.2010.01.001

M3 - Article

C2 - 20149354

AN - SCOPUS:77649179858

VL - 115

SP - 282

EP - 302

JO - Cognition

JF - Cognition

SN - 0010-0277

IS - 2

ER -