TY - JOUR
T1 - Product option framing under the influence of a promotion versus prevention focus
AU - Cheng, Yin Hui
AU - Yen, Hsiu Ju Rebecca
AU - Chuang, Shih Chieh
AU - Chang, Chia Jung
PY - 2013/12
Y1 - 2013/12
N2 - Investigations into the option framing effect involve the use of a subtractive versus an additive option-framing method to gauge their impact on consumer behaviors. This research examines how option framing could affect choice decisions as a function of a consumer's goal orientation. Study 1 offers convergent support for the proposition that regulatory focus moderates the option framing effect and the mediating role of action/inaction on the relationship between regulatory focus and the option framing effect. In particular, a reverse finding shows that promotion-focused consumers provided with a +OF options list tend to choose more options than those who are given a -OF option list. To explain the reverse effect, Study 2 examines and demonstrates regulatory fit as a possible moderator. The results of Study 2 also confirm our inference and echo the same results of Study 1. Finally, based on the regulatory fit theory, Study 3 examines if cognitive constraints associate with a consumer's regulatory orientation may also account for the interaction between regulatory focus and option framing. The results of Study 3 also support the proposition.
AB - Investigations into the option framing effect involve the use of a subtractive versus an additive option-framing method to gauge their impact on consumer behaviors. This research examines how option framing could affect choice decisions as a function of a consumer's goal orientation. Study 1 offers convergent support for the proposition that regulatory focus moderates the option framing effect and the mediating role of action/inaction on the relationship between regulatory focus and the option framing effect. In particular, a reverse finding shows that promotion-focused consumers provided with a +OF options list tend to choose more options than those who are given a -OF option list. To explain the reverse effect, Study 2 examines and demonstrates regulatory fit as a possible moderator. The results of Study 2 also confirm our inference and echo the same results of Study 1. Finally, based on the regulatory fit theory, Study 3 examines if cognitive constraints associate with a consumer's regulatory orientation may also account for the interaction between regulatory focus and option framing. The results of Study 3 also support the proposition.
KW - Option framing
KW - Prevention-focus
KW - Promotion-focus
KW - Regulatory focus
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84888131054&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84888131054&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.joep.2013.06.003
DO - 10.1016/j.joep.2013.06.003
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:84888131054
SN - 0167-4870
VL - 39
SP - 402
EP - 413
JO - Journal of Economic Psychology
JF - Journal of Economic Psychology
ER -