TY - JOUR
T1 - Procedures for Analyzing Multidimensional Mixture Data
AU - Su, Hsu Lin
AU - Chen, Po Hsi
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© The Author(s) 2023.
PY - 2023/12
Y1 - 2023/12
N2 - The multidimensional mixture data structure exists in many test (or inventory) conditions. Heterogeneity also relatively exists in populations. Still, some researchers are interested in deciding to which subpopulation a participant belongs according to the participant’s factor pattern. Thus, in this study, we proposed three analysis procedures based on the factor mixture model to analyze data in the multidimensional mixture context. Simulations were manipulated with different levels of factor numbers, factor correlations, numbers of latent classes, and class separation. Issues with regard to model selection were discussed at first. The results showed that in the two-class situations the procedures of “factor structure first then class number” (Procedure 1) and “factor structure and class number considered simultaneously” (Procedure 3) performed better than the “class number first then factor structure” (Procedure 2) and yielded precise parameter estimation and classification accuracy. It would be appropriate to choose Procedures 1 and 3 when strong measurement invariance is assumed while using an information criterion, but Procedure 1 saved more time than Procedure 3. In the three-class situations, the performance of all three procedures was limited. Implementations and suggestions have been addressed in this research.
AB - The multidimensional mixture data structure exists in many test (or inventory) conditions. Heterogeneity also relatively exists in populations. Still, some researchers are interested in deciding to which subpopulation a participant belongs according to the participant’s factor pattern. Thus, in this study, we proposed three analysis procedures based on the factor mixture model to analyze data in the multidimensional mixture context. Simulations were manipulated with different levels of factor numbers, factor correlations, numbers of latent classes, and class separation. Issues with regard to model selection were discussed at first. The results showed that in the two-class situations the procedures of “factor structure first then class number” (Procedure 1) and “factor structure and class number considered simultaneously” (Procedure 3) performed better than the “class number first then factor structure” (Procedure 2) and yielded precise parameter estimation and classification accuracy. It would be appropriate to choose Procedures 1 and 3 when strong measurement invariance is assumed while using an information criterion, but Procedure 1 saved more time than Procedure 3. In the three-class situations, the performance of all three procedures was limited. Implementations and suggestions have been addressed in this research.
KW - factor mixture model
KW - factor structure
KW - latent class
KW - multidimensional mixture data
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85148425054&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85148425054&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1177/00131644231151470
DO - 10.1177/00131644231151470
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85148425054
SN - 0013-1644
VL - 83
SP - 1173
EP - 1201
JO - Educational and Psychological Measurement
JF - Educational and Psychological Measurement
IS - 6
ER -