Opportunity to learn in the preparation of mathematics teachers: Its structure and how it varies across six countries

William H. Schmidt, Richard T. Houang, Leland Cogan, Sigrid Blömeke, Maria Teresa Tatto, Feng-Jui Hsieh, Marcella Santillan, Kiril Bankov, Shin Il Han, Tenoch Cedillo, John Schwille, Lynn Paine

研究成果: 雜誌貢獻文章

22 引文 (Scopus)

摘要

Cross-national research studies such as the Program for International Student Assessment and the Third International Mathematics and Science Study (TIMSS) have contributed much to our understandings regarding country differences in student achievement in mathematics, especially at the primary (elementary) and lower secondary (middle school) levels. TIMSS, especially, has demonstrated the central role that the concept of opportunity to learn plays in understanding cross-national differences in achievement Schmidt et al., (Why schools matter: A cross-national comparison of curriculum and learning 2001). The curricular expectations of a nation and the actual content exposure that is delivered to students by teachers were found to be among the most salient features of schooling related to academic performance. The other feature that emerges in these studies is the importance of the teacher. The professional competence of the teacher which includes substantive knowledge regarding formal mathematics, mathematics pedagogy and general pedagogy is suggested as being significant-not just in understanding cross-national differences but also in other studies as well (Hill et al. in Am Educ Res J 42(2):371-406, 2005). Mathematics Teaching in the 21st Century (MT21) is a small, six-country study that collected data on future lower secondary teachers in their last year of preparation. One of the findings noted in the first report of that study was that the opportunities future teachers experienced as part of their formal education varied across the six countries (Schmidt et al. in The preparation gap: Teacher education for middle school mathematics in six countries, 2007). This variation in opportunity to learn (OTL) existed in course work related to formal mathematics, mathematics pedagogy and general pedagogy. It appears from these initial results that OTL not only is important in understanding K-12 student learning but it is also likely important in understanding the knowledge base of the teachers who teach them which then has the potential to influence student learning as well. This study using the same MT21 data examines in greater detail the configuration of the educational opportunities future teachers had during their teacher education in some 34 institutions across the six countries.

原文英語
頁(從 - 到)735-747
頁數13
期刊ZDM - International Journal on Mathematics Education
40
發行號5
DOIs
出版狀態已發佈 - 2008 十二月 1

指紋

Preparation
mathematics
Vary
Pedagogy
teacher
Teacher Education
Mathematics Teaching
Student Learning
mathematics studies
science studies
student
learning
PISA study
education
educational opportunity
Knowledge Base
Teaching
Likely
secondary school
Configuration

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Education
  • Mathematics(all)

引用此文

Opportunity to learn in the preparation of mathematics teachers : Its structure and how it varies across six countries. / Schmidt, William H.; Houang, Richard T.; Cogan, Leland; Blömeke, Sigrid; Tatto, Maria Teresa; Hsieh, Feng-Jui; Santillan, Marcella; Bankov, Kiril; Han, Shin Il; Cedillo, Tenoch; Schwille, John; Paine, Lynn.

於: ZDM - International Journal on Mathematics Education, 卷 40, 編號 5, 01.12.2008, p. 735-747.

研究成果: 雜誌貢獻文章

Schmidt, WH, Houang, RT, Cogan, L, Blömeke, S, Tatto, MT, Hsieh, F-J, Santillan, M, Bankov, K, Han, SI, Cedillo, T, Schwille, J & Paine, L 2008, 'Opportunity to learn in the preparation of mathematics teachers: Its structure and how it varies across six countries', ZDM - International Journal on Mathematics Education, 卷 40, 編號 5, 頁 735-747. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-008-0115-y
Schmidt, William H. ; Houang, Richard T. ; Cogan, Leland ; Blömeke, Sigrid ; Tatto, Maria Teresa ; Hsieh, Feng-Jui ; Santillan, Marcella ; Bankov, Kiril ; Han, Shin Il ; Cedillo, Tenoch ; Schwille, John ; Paine, Lynn. / Opportunity to learn in the preparation of mathematics teachers : Its structure and how it varies across six countries. 於: ZDM - International Journal on Mathematics Education. 2008 ; 卷 40, 編號 5. 頁 735-747.
@article{e1b6caa14f024f99bf80fd6fd8a21bfd,
title = "Opportunity to learn in the preparation of mathematics teachers: Its structure and how it varies across six countries",
abstract = "Cross-national research studies such as the Program for International Student Assessment and the Third International Mathematics and Science Study (TIMSS) have contributed much to our understandings regarding country differences in student achievement in mathematics, especially at the primary (elementary) and lower secondary (middle school) levels. TIMSS, especially, has demonstrated the central role that the concept of opportunity to learn plays in understanding cross-national differences in achievement Schmidt et al., (Why schools matter: A cross-national comparison of curriculum and learning 2001). The curricular expectations of a nation and the actual content exposure that is delivered to students by teachers were found to be among the most salient features of schooling related to academic performance. The other feature that emerges in these studies is the importance of the teacher. The professional competence of the teacher which includes substantive knowledge regarding formal mathematics, mathematics pedagogy and general pedagogy is suggested as being significant-not just in understanding cross-national differences but also in other studies as well (Hill et al. in Am Educ Res J 42(2):371-406, 2005). Mathematics Teaching in the 21st Century (MT21) is a small, six-country study that collected data on future lower secondary teachers in their last year of preparation. One of the findings noted in the first report of that study was that the opportunities future teachers experienced as part of their formal education varied across the six countries (Schmidt et al. in The preparation gap: Teacher education for middle school mathematics in six countries, 2007). This variation in opportunity to learn (OTL) existed in course work related to formal mathematics, mathematics pedagogy and general pedagogy. It appears from these initial results that OTL not only is important in understanding K-12 student learning but it is also likely important in understanding the knowledge base of the teachers who teach them which then has the potential to influence student learning as well. This study using the same MT21 data examines in greater detail the configuration of the educational opportunities future teachers had during their teacher education in some 34 institutions across the six countries.",
keywords = "Comparative study of teacher education, Mathematics teacher education, Opportunities to learn, Teacher education curriculum, Teacher preparation",
author = "Schmidt, {William H.} and Houang, {Richard T.} and Leland Cogan and Sigrid Bl{\"o}meke and Tatto, {Maria Teresa} and Feng-Jui Hsieh and Marcella Santillan and Kiril Bankov and Han, {Shin Il} and Tenoch Cedillo and John Schwille and Lynn Paine",
year = "2008",
month = "12",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1007/s11858-008-0115-y",
language = "English",
volume = "40",
pages = "735--747",
journal = "ZDM - International Journal on Mathematics Education",
issn = "1863-9690",
publisher = "Springer Verlag",
number = "5",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Opportunity to learn in the preparation of mathematics teachers

T2 - Its structure and how it varies across six countries

AU - Schmidt, William H.

AU - Houang, Richard T.

AU - Cogan, Leland

AU - Blömeke, Sigrid

AU - Tatto, Maria Teresa

AU - Hsieh, Feng-Jui

AU - Santillan, Marcella

AU - Bankov, Kiril

AU - Han, Shin Il

AU - Cedillo, Tenoch

AU - Schwille, John

AU - Paine, Lynn

PY - 2008/12/1

Y1 - 2008/12/1

N2 - Cross-national research studies such as the Program for International Student Assessment and the Third International Mathematics and Science Study (TIMSS) have contributed much to our understandings regarding country differences in student achievement in mathematics, especially at the primary (elementary) and lower secondary (middle school) levels. TIMSS, especially, has demonstrated the central role that the concept of opportunity to learn plays in understanding cross-national differences in achievement Schmidt et al., (Why schools matter: A cross-national comparison of curriculum and learning 2001). The curricular expectations of a nation and the actual content exposure that is delivered to students by teachers were found to be among the most salient features of schooling related to academic performance. The other feature that emerges in these studies is the importance of the teacher. The professional competence of the teacher which includes substantive knowledge regarding formal mathematics, mathematics pedagogy and general pedagogy is suggested as being significant-not just in understanding cross-national differences but also in other studies as well (Hill et al. in Am Educ Res J 42(2):371-406, 2005). Mathematics Teaching in the 21st Century (MT21) is a small, six-country study that collected data on future lower secondary teachers in their last year of preparation. One of the findings noted in the first report of that study was that the opportunities future teachers experienced as part of their formal education varied across the six countries (Schmidt et al. in The preparation gap: Teacher education for middle school mathematics in six countries, 2007). This variation in opportunity to learn (OTL) existed in course work related to formal mathematics, mathematics pedagogy and general pedagogy. It appears from these initial results that OTL not only is important in understanding K-12 student learning but it is also likely important in understanding the knowledge base of the teachers who teach them which then has the potential to influence student learning as well. This study using the same MT21 data examines in greater detail the configuration of the educational opportunities future teachers had during their teacher education in some 34 institutions across the six countries.

AB - Cross-national research studies such as the Program for International Student Assessment and the Third International Mathematics and Science Study (TIMSS) have contributed much to our understandings regarding country differences in student achievement in mathematics, especially at the primary (elementary) and lower secondary (middle school) levels. TIMSS, especially, has demonstrated the central role that the concept of opportunity to learn plays in understanding cross-national differences in achievement Schmidt et al., (Why schools matter: A cross-national comparison of curriculum and learning 2001). The curricular expectations of a nation and the actual content exposure that is delivered to students by teachers were found to be among the most salient features of schooling related to academic performance. The other feature that emerges in these studies is the importance of the teacher. The professional competence of the teacher which includes substantive knowledge regarding formal mathematics, mathematics pedagogy and general pedagogy is suggested as being significant-not just in understanding cross-national differences but also in other studies as well (Hill et al. in Am Educ Res J 42(2):371-406, 2005). Mathematics Teaching in the 21st Century (MT21) is a small, six-country study that collected data on future lower secondary teachers in their last year of preparation. One of the findings noted in the first report of that study was that the opportunities future teachers experienced as part of their formal education varied across the six countries (Schmidt et al. in The preparation gap: Teacher education for middle school mathematics in six countries, 2007). This variation in opportunity to learn (OTL) existed in course work related to formal mathematics, mathematics pedagogy and general pedagogy. It appears from these initial results that OTL not only is important in understanding K-12 student learning but it is also likely important in understanding the knowledge base of the teachers who teach them which then has the potential to influence student learning as well. This study using the same MT21 data examines in greater detail the configuration of the educational opportunities future teachers had during their teacher education in some 34 institutions across the six countries.

KW - Comparative study of teacher education

KW - Mathematics teacher education

KW - Opportunities to learn

KW - Teacher education curriculum

KW - Teacher preparation

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84867372688&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84867372688&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/s11858-008-0115-y

DO - 10.1007/s11858-008-0115-y

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:84867372688

VL - 40

SP - 735

EP - 747

JO - ZDM - International Journal on Mathematics Education

JF - ZDM - International Journal on Mathematics Education

SN - 1863-9690

IS - 5

ER -