On the importance of distinguishing between within- and between-subject effects in intransitive intertemporal choice

Rung Ching Tsai, Ulf Böckenholt

研究成果: 雜誌貢獻文章

5 引文 斯高帕斯(Scopus)

摘要

Most probabilistic paired comparison models treat inconsistent choices as caused by independent and random errors in the pairwise judgments. In this paper, we argue that this assumption is too restrictive for the analysis of paired comparison data obtained from multiple judges when transitivity violations are systematic. We present a new framework that contains the random error assumption as a special case but also allows for systematic changes in an option's utility assessments over the pairwise comparisons. Accounting for both between- and within-judge sources of variability, we demonstrate in an application on intertemporal choice that the proposed framework can capture systematic transitivity violations as well as individual taste differences.

原文英語
頁(從 - 到)10-20
頁數11
期刊Journal of Mathematical Psychology
52
發行號1
DOIs
出版狀態已發佈 - 2008 二月 1

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Psychology(all)
  • Applied Mathematics

指紋 深入研究「On the importance of distinguishing between within- and between-subject effects in intransitive intertemporal choice」主題。共同形成了獨特的指紋。

  • 引用此