TY - JOUR
T1 - Identifying secondary science teachers’ adoption styles of technology-based assessments and examining the patterns of teachers’ beliefs, attitudes, and intention
T2 - A latent class analysis approach
AU - Zhang, Ren Cheng
AU - Wu, Hsin Kai
AU - Chien, Sung Pei
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2024.
PY - 2024
Y1 - 2024
N2 - The aim of this study was to investigate whether secondary science teachers had different styles of technology adoption for technology-based assessments (TBAs), and whether teachers with different adoption styles showed different patterns of beliefs, attitudes and intentions regarding TBAs. By combining the variable-centered and person-centered approaches to explore science teachers’ adoption styles and associated beliefs, this study sheds light on how to provide needed supports and resources for teachers who adopt TBAs differently. We first employed latent class analysis to identify science teachers’ TBA adoption styles and then utilized multigroup path analysis to examine the beliefs, attitudes, and intentions within each style. A total of 494 secondary school science teachers from northern Taiwan participated in this study. A validated questionnaire about teachers’ TBA use and related technology beliefs was used to collect data. The latent class analysis revealed three different adoption styles: Technology Rich Adopter, Technology Selective Adopter, and Technology Minimalist Adopter. The path analyses of the three groups showed that while Technology Selective and Technology Minimalist Adopters’ intentions to use TBAs could be predicted by their attitudes, perceived behavioral control, and subjective norms, Technology Rich Adopters’ intentions were not associated with subjective norms. Additionally, whereas the same set of significant attitudinal antecedents were found among the three groups, the effects of antecedent variables on perceived behavioral control and subjective norms varied.
AB - The aim of this study was to investigate whether secondary science teachers had different styles of technology adoption for technology-based assessments (TBAs), and whether teachers with different adoption styles showed different patterns of beliefs, attitudes and intentions regarding TBAs. By combining the variable-centered and person-centered approaches to explore science teachers’ adoption styles and associated beliefs, this study sheds light on how to provide needed supports and resources for teachers who adopt TBAs differently. We first employed latent class analysis to identify science teachers’ TBA adoption styles and then utilized multigroup path analysis to examine the beliefs, attitudes, and intentions within each style. A total of 494 secondary school science teachers from northern Taiwan participated in this study. A validated questionnaire about teachers’ TBA use and related technology beliefs was used to collect data. The latent class analysis revealed three different adoption styles: Technology Rich Adopter, Technology Selective Adopter, and Technology Minimalist Adopter. The path analyses of the three groups showed that while Technology Selective and Technology Minimalist Adopters’ intentions to use TBAs could be predicted by their attitudes, perceived behavioral control, and subjective norms, Technology Rich Adopters’ intentions were not associated with subjective norms. Additionally, whereas the same set of significant attitudinal antecedents were found among the three groups, the effects of antecedent variables on perceived behavioral control and subjective norms varied.
KW - Evaluation methodologies
KW - Latent class analysis
KW - Secondary education
KW - Teacher professional development
KW - Teachers’ beliefs
KW - Technology-based assessment
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85192075997&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85192075997&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1007/s10639-024-12721-z
DO - 10.1007/s10639-024-12721-z
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85192075997
SN - 1360-2357
JO - Education and Information Technologies
JF - Education and Information Technologies
ER -