TY - JOUR
T1 - Examining the Structure of the Career Adapt-Abilities Scale
T2 - The Cooperation Dimension and a Five-Factor Model
AU - Nye, Christopher D.
AU - Leong, Frederick
AU - Prasad, Joshua
AU - Gardner, Danielle
AU - Tien, Hsiu Lan Shelley
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© The Author(s) 2017.
PY - 2018/8/1
Y1 - 2018/8/1
N2 - The Career Adapt-Abilities Scale (CAAS), a measure developed to evaluate an individual’s level of career adaptability, was initially validated as consisting of four factors (concern, control, curiosity, and confidence). The following study explores the structural validity of the CAAS when a fifth factor, cooperation, is included. Beyond examining the structural validity, we additionally conducted a cross-cultural validation of the five-factor model across American, Chinese, and Taiwanese samples. Our cross-cultural comparisons provided some support for the factorial equivalence of the five-factor Career Adapt-Abilities Scale (CAAS-5) in terms of the configural model. However, the results for the scalar model gave some indication of nonequivalence. Follow-up analyses showed that all items functioned similarly across groups, suggesting that small deviations in item functioning may have resulted in nonequivalence when aggregated to the scale level. Given the conceptual importance of cooperation’s inclusion, we contend that future research on career adaptability should explore the CAAS-5 further.
AB - The Career Adapt-Abilities Scale (CAAS), a measure developed to evaluate an individual’s level of career adaptability, was initially validated as consisting of four factors (concern, control, curiosity, and confidence). The following study explores the structural validity of the CAAS when a fifth factor, cooperation, is included. Beyond examining the structural validity, we additionally conducted a cross-cultural validation of the five-factor model across American, Chinese, and Taiwanese samples. Our cross-cultural comparisons provided some support for the factorial equivalence of the five-factor Career Adapt-Abilities Scale (CAAS-5) in terms of the configural model. However, the results for the scalar model gave some indication of nonequivalence. Follow-up analyses showed that all items functioned similarly across groups, suggesting that small deviations in item functioning may have resulted in nonequivalence when aggregated to the scale level. Given the conceptual importance of cooperation’s inclusion, we contend that future research on career adaptability should explore the CAAS-5 further.
KW - career adaptability
KW - cross-cultural comparisons
KW - interpersonal adaptability
KW - measurement equivalence
KW - structural validity
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85049975123&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85049975123&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1177/1069072717722767
DO - 10.1177/1069072717722767
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85049975123
SN - 1069-0727
VL - 26
SP - 549
EP - 562
JO - Journal of Career Assessment
JF - Journal of Career Assessment
IS - 3
ER -