Examining the role of feedback messages in undergraduate students' writing performance during an online peer assessment activity

Kun Hung Cheng, Jyh Chong Liang, Chin Chung Tsai

研究成果: 雜誌貢獻文章

33 引文 (Scopus)

摘要

Although the effectiveness of online peer assessment for writing performance has been documented, some students may not perceive or attain learning benefits due to receiving certain types of feedback messages. This study therefore aims to explore the role of feedback messages in students' writing performance. The feedback messages given by 47 undergraduate students in a three-round online peer assessment review were firstly examined by a series of content analyses regarding the affective, cognitive, and metacognitive aspects of the comments. The influences of the feedback messages on the students' performance progression during the three rounds of review were then explored. The results show that cognitive feedback (e.g.,direct correction) was more helpful for the students' writing learning gains than was affective feedback (e.g., praising comments) and metacognitive feedback (e.g., reflecting comments). However, this effect on the students' performance progression decreased in the last stage of the activity.

原文英語
頁(從 - 到)78-84
頁數7
期刊Internet and Higher Education
25
DOIs
出版狀態已發佈 - 2015 一月 1

指紋

Students
Feedback
performance
student
learning

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Education
  • Computer Science Applications
  • Computer Networks and Communications

引用此文

@article{5f73a590f59a4662b318b969ab62a8bb,
title = "Examining the role of feedback messages in undergraduate students' writing performance during an online peer assessment activity",
abstract = "Although the effectiveness of online peer assessment for writing performance has been documented, some students may not perceive or attain learning benefits due to receiving certain types of feedback messages. This study therefore aims to explore the role of feedback messages in students' writing performance. The feedback messages given by 47 undergraduate students in a three-round online peer assessment review were firstly examined by a series of content analyses regarding the affective, cognitive, and metacognitive aspects of the comments. The influences of the feedback messages on the students' performance progression during the three rounds of review were then explored. The results show that cognitive feedback (e.g.,direct correction) was more helpful for the students' writing learning gains than was affective feedback (e.g., praising comments) and metacognitive feedback (e.g., reflecting comments). However, this effect on the students' performance progression decreased in the last stage of the activity.",
keywords = "Affection, Cognition, Content analysis, Metacognition, Online peer assessment, Peer feedback",
author = "Cheng, {Kun Hung} and Liang, {Jyh Chong} and Tsai, {Chin Chung}",
year = "2015",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.iheduc.2015.02.001",
language = "English",
volume = "25",
pages = "78--84",
journal = "Internet and Higher Education",
issn = "1096-7516",
publisher = "Elsevier BV",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Examining the role of feedback messages in undergraduate students' writing performance during an online peer assessment activity

AU - Cheng, Kun Hung

AU - Liang, Jyh Chong

AU - Tsai, Chin Chung

PY - 2015/1/1

Y1 - 2015/1/1

N2 - Although the effectiveness of online peer assessment for writing performance has been documented, some students may not perceive or attain learning benefits due to receiving certain types of feedback messages. This study therefore aims to explore the role of feedback messages in students' writing performance. The feedback messages given by 47 undergraduate students in a three-round online peer assessment review were firstly examined by a series of content analyses regarding the affective, cognitive, and metacognitive aspects of the comments. The influences of the feedback messages on the students' performance progression during the three rounds of review were then explored. The results show that cognitive feedback (e.g.,direct correction) was more helpful for the students' writing learning gains than was affective feedback (e.g., praising comments) and metacognitive feedback (e.g., reflecting comments). However, this effect on the students' performance progression decreased in the last stage of the activity.

AB - Although the effectiveness of online peer assessment for writing performance has been documented, some students may not perceive or attain learning benefits due to receiving certain types of feedback messages. This study therefore aims to explore the role of feedback messages in students' writing performance. The feedback messages given by 47 undergraduate students in a three-round online peer assessment review were firstly examined by a series of content analyses regarding the affective, cognitive, and metacognitive aspects of the comments. The influences of the feedback messages on the students' performance progression during the three rounds of review were then explored. The results show that cognitive feedback (e.g.,direct correction) was more helpful for the students' writing learning gains than was affective feedback (e.g., praising comments) and metacognitive feedback (e.g., reflecting comments). However, this effect on the students' performance progression decreased in the last stage of the activity.

KW - Affection

KW - Cognition

KW - Content analysis

KW - Metacognition

KW - Online peer assessment

KW - Peer feedback

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84923329998&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84923329998&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.iheduc.2015.02.001

DO - 10.1016/j.iheduc.2015.02.001

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:84923329998

VL - 25

SP - 78

EP - 84

JO - Internet and Higher Education

JF - Internet and Higher Education

SN - 1096-7516

ER -