TY - JOUR
T1 - Evaluating two 7th grade texts of "pyramid of energy flow"
AU - Yeh, Chia Cheng
AU - Yang, Wen Gin
AU - Liao, Pin Yin
AU - Huang, Bo Sen
PY - 2011/6
Y1 - 2011/6
N2 - This study investigates the differences between two texts (X-version and Y-version) regarding pyramid of energy flow in 7th grade science textbooks, conducting a stepwise regression analysis of language base on systemic functional linguistics. The analysis required studying the number of events, lexical density, zero anaphora, nominal groups, technical construction, and cohesion, to clarify the differences between the two texts. The results of this study showed no differences between these two texts regarding the number of events and lexical density. The Y-version provided more cues for readers to retrace the zero anaphora and understand the taxonomy of nominal groups. For providing interpretations of scientific concepts, the Y-version was more cohesive compared to the X-version by using more language resources, such as conjunctions and adverbs. Therefore, evaluations of the texts should consider the features of Mandarin and the language of science.
AB - This study investigates the differences between two texts (X-version and Y-version) regarding pyramid of energy flow in 7th grade science textbooks, conducting a stepwise regression analysis of language base on systemic functional linguistics. The analysis required studying the number of events, lexical density, zero anaphora, nominal groups, technical construction, and cohesion, to clarify the differences between the two texts. The results of this study showed no differences between these two texts regarding the number of events and lexical density. The Y-version provided more cues for readers to retrace the zero anaphora and understand the taxonomy of nominal groups. For providing interpretations of scientific concepts, the Y-version was more cohesive compared to the X-version by using more language resources, such as conjunctions and adverbs. Therefore, evaluations of the texts should consider the features of Mandarin and the language of science.
KW - Cohesion
KW - Features of Mandarin
KW - Language of science
KW - Science text
KW - Technicality construction
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84965172902&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84965172902&partnerID=8YFLogxK
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:84965172902
SN - 2073-753X
VL - 56
SP - 175
EP - 206
JO - Journal of Research in Education Sciences
JF - Journal of Research in Education Sciences
IS - 2
ER -