TY - JOUR
T1 - Evaluating retrofitting and operational efficiency of automobile air conditioners using environmentally-friendly refrigerants
AU - Wei, Yi Jia
AU - Teng, Tun Ping
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2025 Elsevier Ltd
PY - 2025/6/1
Y1 - 2025/6/1
N2 - This study evaluated two low global warming potential (GWP) refrigerants as direct replacements for R134a in automotive air conditioners (AACs) to meet international environmental protection standards. R152a and R1234yf were substituted with 75 % (300 g) and 110 % (440 g) of the R134a filling capacity (400 g) for AACs, respectively. Additionally, operating efficiency tests of AACs with various refrigerants were conducted under different outdoor ambient temperatures (Toa, DB: 30, 35, and 40°C) and compressor speeds (1000 and 1800 rpm) while maintaining fixed indoor conditions. The results indicated that the performance metrics, including compression ratio, cooling capacity, electrical power consumption (Pc), and energy efficiency ratio (EER), were superior for AACs using R152a compared to those using R134a across all experimental conditions. When performing performance tests at Toa, DB of 35 °C, and a compressor speed of 1800 rpm, the Pc for R152a and R1234yf were 5.96 % and 5.04 % lower than those of the original AAC. The EER values were 11.26 % and 1.45 % higher than those of the original AAC. Furthermore, the total equivalent warming impact (TEWI) of R152a is better than that of R1234yf when the daily driving duration exceeds 4.9 h. This suggests that R152a offers both energy-saving and environmental protection effects when used in AACs for extended driving periods.
AB - This study evaluated two low global warming potential (GWP) refrigerants as direct replacements for R134a in automotive air conditioners (AACs) to meet international environmental protection standards. R152a and R1234yf were substituted with 75 % (300 g) and 110 % (440 g) of the R134a filling capacity (400 g) for AACs, respectively. Additionally, operating efficiency tests of AACs with various refrigerants were conducted under different outdoor ambient temperatures (Toa, DB: 30, 35, and 40°C) and compressor speeds (1000 and 1800 rpm) while maintaining fixed indoor conditions. The results indicated that the performance metrics, including compression ratio, cooling capacity, electrical power consumption (Pc), and energy efficiency ratio (EER), were superior for AACs using R152a compared to those using R134a across all experimental conditions. When performing performance tests at Toa, DB of 35 °C, and a compressor speed of 1800 rpm, the Pc for R152a and R1234yf were 5.96 % and 5.04 % lower than those of the original AAC. The EER values were 11.26 % and 1.45 % higher than those of the original AAC. Furthermore, the total equivalent warming impact (TEWI) of R152a is better than that of R1234yf when the daily driving duration exceeds 4.9 h. This suggests that R152a offers both energy-saving and environmental protection effects when used in AACs for extended driving periods.
KW - Automobile air conditioners (AACs)
KW - Coefficient of performance (COP)
KW - Cooling capacity
KW - Energy efficiency ratio (EER)
KW - Total equivalent warming impact (TEWI)
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85217503416&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85217503416&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2025.125874
DO - 10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2025.125874
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85217503416
SN - 1359-4311
VL - 268
JO - Applied Thermal Engineering
JF - Applied Thermal Engineering
M1 - 125874
ER -