TY - JOUR
T1 - Evaluating fit indices in a multilevel latent growth curve model
T2 - A Monte Carlo study
AU - Hsu, Hsien Yuan
AU - Lin, John J.H.
AU - Skidmore, Susan Troncoso
AU - Kim, Minjung
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2018, Psychonomic Society, Inc.
PY - 2019/2/15
Y1 - 2019/2/15
N2 - The multilevel latent growth curve model (MLGCM), which is subsumed by the multilevel structural equation modeling framework, has been advocated as a means of investigating individual and cluster trajectories. Still, how to evaluate the goodness of fit of MLGCMs has not been well addressed. The purpose of this study was to conduct a systematic Monte Carlo simulation to carefully investigate the effectiveness of (a) level-specific fit indices and (b) target-specific fit indices in an MLGCM, in terms of their independence from the sample size’s influence and their sensitivity to misspecification in the MLGCM that occurs in either the between-covariance, between-mean, or within-covariance structure. The design factors included the number of clusters, the cluster size, and the model specification. We used Mplus 7.4 to generate simulated replications and estimate each of the models. We appropriately controlled the severity of misspecification when we generated the simulated replications. The simulation results suggested that applying RMSEA T_S_COV , TLI T _ S _ COV , and SRMR B maximizes the capacity to detect misspecifications in the between-covariance structure. Moreover, the use of RMSEA PS _ B , CFI PS _ B , and TLI PS _ B is recommended for evaluating the fit of the between-mean structure. Finally, we found that evaluation of the within-covariance structure turned out to be unexpectedly challenging, because none of the within-level-specific fit indices (RMSEA PS _ W , CFI PS _ W , TLI PS _ W , and SRMR W ) had a practically significant sensitivity.
AB - The multilevel latent growth curve model (MLGCM), which is subsumed by the multilevel structural equation modeling framework, has been advocated as a means of investigating individual and cluster trajectories. Still, how to evaluate the goodness of fit of MLGCMs has not been well addressed. The purpose of this study was to conduct a systematic Monte Carlo simulation to carefully investigate the effectiveness of (a) level-specific fit indices and (b) target-specific fit indices in an MLGCM, in terms of their independence from the sample size’s influence and their sensitivity to misspecification in the MLGCM that occurs in either the between-covariance, between-mean, or within-covariance structure. The design factors included the number of clusters, the cluster size, and the model specification. We used Mplus 7.4 to generate simulated replications and estimate each of the models. We appropriately controlled the severity of misspecification when we generated the simulated replications. The simulation results suggested that applying RMSEA T_S_COV , TLI T _ S _ COV , and SRMR B maximizes the capacity to detect misspecifications in the between-covariance structure. Moreover, the use of RMSEA PS _ B , CFI PS _ B , and TLI PS _ B is recommended for evaluating the fit of the between-mean structure. Finally, we found that evaluation of the within-covariance structure turned out to be unexpectedly challenging, because none of the within-level-specific fit indices (RMSEA PS _ W , CFI PS _ W , TLI PS _ W , and SRMR W ) had a practically significant sensitivity.
KW - Fit index
KW - Model evaluation
KW - Multilevel latent growth curve model
KW - Multilevel structural equation modeling
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85058376489&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85058376489&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.3758/s13428-018-1169-6
DO - 10.3758/s13428-018-1169-6
M3 - Article
C2 - 30536150
AN - SCOPUS:85058376489
SN - 1554-351X
VL - 51
SP - 172
EP - 194
JO - Behavior Research Methods
JF - Behavior Research Methods
IS - 1
ER -