TY - JOUR
T1 - European exchange rate regimes and purchasing power parity
T2 - An empirical study on eleven eurozone countries
AU - Huang, Chao Hsi
AU - Yang, Chih Yuan
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2014 Elsevier Inc.
PY - 2015/1/1
Y1 - 2015/1/1
N2 - It is widely believed that following the adoption of the euro, long run purchasing power parity (PPP) is more likely to hold within the euro countries. By applying the panel unit root test of Pesaran (2007) to real exchange rate data of eleven euro countries for the sample period of January 1957 to May 2013, we find that, contrary to the above intuition, the evidence for the mean-reverting in real exchange rates is much weaker in the post-1998 euro period than in the pre-euro period. In contrast, we find that for the four countries not using the euro: Norway, Sweden, Switzerland, and the UK, the evidence for the mean-reverting in real exchange rates is strong in both the pre- and post-euro (post-1998) periods. Moreover, through our panel estimation of the error correction model using the common correlated effects (CCE) estimators a la Pesaran (2006), we find that the flexibility of nominal exchange rates is crucial for the adjustment of real exchange rates to PPP.
AB - It is widely believed that following the adoption of the euro, long run purchasing power parity (PPP) is more likely to hold within the euro countries. By applying the panel unit root test of Pesaran (2007) to real exchange rate data of eleven euro countries for the sample period of January 1957 to May 2013, we find that, contrary to the above intuition, the evidence for the mean-reverting in real exchange rates is much weaker in the post-1998 euro period than in the pre-euro period. In contrast, we find that for the four countries not using the euro: Norway, Sweden, Switzerland, and the UK, the evidence for the mean-reverting in real exchange rates is strong in both the pre- and post-euro (post-1998) periods. Moreover, through our panel estimation of the error correction model using the common correlated effects (CCE) estimators a la Pesaran (2006), we find that the flexibility of nominal exchange rates is crucial for the adjustment of real exchange rates to PPP.
KW - Error correction model
KW - Nominal exchange rate regime
KW - Panel unit root test
KW - Purchasing power parity
KW - Real exchange rate
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84907766726&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84907766726&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.iref.2014.09.008
DO - 10.1016/j.iref.2014.09.008
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:84907766726
SN - 1059-0560
VL - 35
SP - 100
EP - 109
JO - International Review of Economics and Finance
JF - International Review of Economics and Finance
ER -