TY - JOUR
T1 - Educational accountability system in local government
T2 - Current conditions and impact
AU - Lai, Yen Chywan
AU - Wang, Li Yun
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2014 National Taiwan Normal University. All Rights Reserved.
PY - 2014/9/1
Y1 - 2014/9/1
N2 - The emerging influences of the “New Right” and the “New Public Management” have prompted the government to incorporate additional ideas of market principles and responsiveness in their management. A public accountability system is established when the demands for efficiency and answerability increase. Because local governments are currently the major providers of education, examining how the educational accountability system functions in local government is crucial. The concepts, types, and operations of accountability systems in local governments were examined. Five types of accountability system, namely hierarchical accountability, legal accountability, political accountability, professional accountability, and social accountability, were considered. Language Enrichment Curriculum of Taipei County (now New Taipei City) was used as the case for study. Document analysis and interviews were used to collect information on how the five types of accountability system functioned in this case. Hierarchical accountability lacks the coercive power it is intended to exert. Legal accountability relies mainly on financial control and is often subjected to political intervention. Political accountability has limited influence because of its poor connection with elections. Professional accountability is weak for cultural reasons. Social accountability is vigorous but mainly dominated by interest groups. Conflicts among different accountability systems are often observed and political interventions are common. In addition, suggestions are provided.
AB - The emerging influences of the “New Right” and the “New Public Management” have prompted the government to incorporate additional ideas of market principles and responsiveness in their management. A public accountability system is established when the demands for efficiency and answerability increase. Because local governments are currently the major providers of education, examining how the educational accountability system functions in local government is crucial. The concepts, types, and operations of accountability systems in local governments were examined. Five types of accountability system, namely hierarchical accountability, legal accountability, political accountability, professional accountability, and social accountability, were considered. Language Enrichment Curriculum of Taipei County (now New Taipei City) was used as the case for study. Document analysis and interviews were used to collect information on how the five types of accountability system functioned in this case. Hierarchical accountability lacks the coercive power it is intended to exert. Legal accountability relies mainly on financial control and is often subjected to political intervention. Political accountability has limited influence because of its poor connection with elections. Professional accountability is weak for cultural reasons. Social accountability is vigorous but mainly dominated by interest groups. Conflicts among different accountability systems are often observed and political interventions are common. In addition, suggestions are provided.
KW - Educational accountability
KW - Educational governance
KW - Language enrichment curriculum
KW - Local governance
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84908441250&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84908441250&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.6209/JORIES.2014.59(3).04
DO - 10.6209/JORIES.2014.59(3).04
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:84908441250
SN - 2073-753X
VL - 59
SP - 97
EP - 132
JO - Journal of Research in Education Sciences
JF - Journal of Research in Education Sciences
IS - 3
ER -