跳至主導覽
跳至搜尋
跳過主要內容
國立臺灣師範大學 首頁
專家資料申請/更新
English
中文
首頁
個人檔案
研究單位
研究成果
研究計畫
新聞/媒體
資料集
學術活動
得獎記錄
學生論文
按專業知識、姓名或所屬機構搜尋
Development and Validation of the Integrative Activity Pedagogical Content Knowledge Scale for Junior High School Teachers
Su Pin Hung
*
, Cheng Ta Chen,
Yu Lin Chang
*
此作品的通信作者
教育心理與輔導學系
創造力發展碩士在職專班
研究成果
:
雜誌貢獻
›
期刊論文
›
同行評審
總覽
指紋
指紋
深入研究「Development and Validation of the Integrative Activity Pedagogical Content Knowledge Scale for Junior High School Teachers」主題。共同形成了獨特的指紋。
排序方式
重量
按字母排序
Social Sciences
Secondary Schools
100%
Reentry
83%
Pre-Service Teacher
66%
Instructional Media
50%
Content Analysis
33%
Focus Group
33%
Instructional Strategy
33%
In-service Teachers
33%
Education
33%
Life Skills
33%
Objective Knowledge
33%
Credit
33%
Educational Context
33%
Education Programs
33%
Inservice Training
16%
Self Evaluation
16%
Curriculum Development
16%
Education Level
16%
Systematic Review
16%
Item Analysis
16%
Instructional Practice
16%
Teaching Context
16%
Educational Policy
16%
Organization and Methods
16%
Teacher Role
16%
Female Teacher
16%
Knowledge Development
16%
Congruence
16%
Knowledge Representation
16%
Critical Thinking
16%
Organisation for Economic Co-Operation and Development
16%
Construct Validity
16%
Measurement Method
16%
Model Theory
16%
Knowledge Domain
16%
International Organization
16%
Student Outcome
16%
High School Level
16%
INIS
schools
100%
dimensions
100%
validation
100%
levels
60%
performance
50%
education
50%
reliability
50%
reentry
50%
teaching
40%
evaluation
30%
values
20%
surveys
20%
gain
20%
tools
20%
content analysis
20%
credits
20%
females
10%
charts
10%
reflection
10%
reviews
10%
information
10%
data
10%
range
10%
children
10%
economics
10%
males
10%
data analysis
10%
dynamics
10%
demand
10%
policy
10%
planning
10%
job training
10%
recommendations
10%
cooperation
10%
radar
10%
international organizations
10%
negotiation
10%
Psychology
Content Knowledge
100%
Semistructured Interview
12%
Focus Group
8%
Education Program
8%
Internalize
4%
Congruence
4%
Self-Assessment
4%
Construct Validity
4%
Mixed Methods
4%
Critical Thinking
4%
Multiple Intelligence
4%
Latent Trait
4%
Domain Knowledge
4%
Systematic Review
4%
Face Validity
4%