TY - JOUR
T1 - Conceptualizing spatial abilities and their relation to science learning from a cognitive perspective
AU - Chen, Yi Chun
AU - Yang, Fang Ying
AU - Chang, Cheng Chieh
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2020, Scientia Socialis Ltd. All rights reserved.
PY - 2020
Y1 - 2020
N2 - Science learning requires visuospatial thinking. Accordingly, spatial ability is regarded as the key to learning science well, but its effects are sometimes not as significant as expected. To this end, this research aims to conceptualize spatial abilities and to clarify their relation to science learning based on an analysis of empirical studies. Content analysis of 39 studies showed that (1) intrinsic-dynamic skills are the most frequently measured, (2) the explored science topics mostly involve well-established knowledge, (3) the effects of spatial ability on science achievement are inconsistent, and (4) educational interventions are not always effective in improving students’ spatial abilities or science achievement. It is argued that domain knowledge interferes with the study results and that domain-specific spatial ability exists, referring to apply spatial-type and domain-specific knowledge. Supported by cognitive theories and empirical evidence, a model is constructed to exhibit the relations between domain-general and domain-specific spatial ability as well as their effects on science achievement. According to the model, the two spatial abilities functionally partially overlap in the operations of spatial skills, and educational experience and malleable spatial skills are reciprocal; however, improvement in general spatial ability, involving the function of the central executive system, is likely limited.
AB - Science learning requires visuospatial thinking. Accordingly, spatial ability is regarded as the key to learning science well, but its effects are sometimes not as significant as expected. To this end, this research aims to conceptualize spatial abilities and to clarify their relation to science learning based on an analysis of empirical studies. Content analysis of 39 studies showed that (1) intrinsic-dynamic skills are the most frequently measured, (2) the explored science topics mostly involve well-established knowledge, (3) the effects of spatial ability on science achievement are inconsistent, and (4) educational interventions are not always effective in improving students’ spatial abilities or science achievement. It is argued that domain knowledge interferes with the study results and that domain-specific spatial ability exists, referring to apply spatial-type and domain-specific knowledge. Supported by cognitive theories and empirical evidence, a model is constructed to exhibit the relations between domain-general and domain-specific spatial ability as well as their effects on science achievement. According to the model, the two spatial abilities functionally partially overlap in the operations of spatial skills, and educational experience and malleable spatial skills are reciprocal; however, improvement in general spatial ability, involving the function of the central executive system, is likely limited.
KW - Domain knowledge
KW - Domain-generality
KW - Domain-specificity
KW - Educational intervention
KW - Science learning
KW - Spatial ability
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85079479663&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85079479663&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.33225/jbse/20.19.50
DO - 10.33225/jbse/20.19.50
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85079479663
SN - 1648-3898
VL - 19
SP - 50
EP - 63
JO - Journal of Baltic Science Education
JF - Journal of Baltic Science Education
IS - 1
ER -