TY - JOUR
T1 - Closing achievement gaps and beyond
T2 - teachers’ reactions to the remedial education policy in Taiwan
AU - Chen, Hsiao Lan Sharon
AU - Yu, Patricia
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2016, Education Research Institute, Seoul National University, Seoul, Korea.
PY - 2016/12/1
Y1 - 2016/12/1
N2 - Educators have increasingly implemented remedial education in elementary and secondary schools throughout Taiwan as a systemic approach toward closing achievement gaps. However, students from lower socioeconomic backgrounds and those in remote areas have shown little improvement in academic achievement. This issue raises the question of how educators are providing needed learning support to disadvantaged students in school and classroom settings. Thus, this study applies grounded theory to investigate teachers’ reactions to the remedial education policy in Taiwan, to have a reflective assessment on the policy, and to provide suggestions for policy implementation. The findings suggest that teachers’ responses to this government-imposed, centralized approach—classified as “cosmetic compliance,” “professional commitment,” and “try-out participation”—vary widely based on whether their ideological underpinnings are consistent with the government’s policy intent to close achievement gaps, and on whether they are equipped with professional knowledge and practical strategies to support the effective implementation of remedial education. Based on the findings, this study develops an interactive systemic model for more effectively implementing the remedial education policy, which illustrates a conceptualization that educational practitioners can hold professional autonomy while improving teaching and learning for low-achieving students.
AB - Educators have increasingly implemented remedial education in elementary and secondary schools throughout Taiwan as a systemic approach toward closing achievement gaps. However, students from lower socioeconomic backgrounds and those in remote areas have shown little improvement in academic achievement. This issue raises the question of how educators are providing needed learning support to disadvantaged students in school and classroom settings. Thus, this study applies grounded theory to investigate teachers’ reactions to the remedial education policy in Taiwan, to have a reflective assessment on the policy, and to provide suggestions for policy implementation. The findings suggest that teachers’ responses to this government-imposed, centralized approach—classified as “cosmetic compliance,” “professional commitment,” and “try-out participation”—vary widely based on whether their ideological underpinnings are consistent with the government’s policy intent to close achievement gaps, and on whether they are equipped with professional knowledge and practical strategies to support the effective implementation of remedial education. Based on the findings, this study develops an interactive systemic model for more effectively implementing the remedial education policy, which illustrates a conceptualization that educational practitioners can hold professional autonomy while improving teaching and learning for low-achieving students.
KW - Achievement gaps
KW - Grounded theory
KW - Policy assessment
KW - Remedial education
KW - Teachers’ reactions
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84975481758&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84975481758&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1007/s12564-016-9440-y
DO - 10.1007/s12564-016-9440-y
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:84975481758
SN - 1598-1037
VL - 17
SP - 609
EP - 624
JO - Asia Pacific Education Review
JF - Asia Pacific Education Review
IS - 4
ER -