摘要
Concern has risen that current global warming and more frequent extreme events such as droughts and floods will increase conflict around the world. This concern has spurred both social science research on contemporary climate, peace, and conflict as well as research in the historical sciences on past climate, weather, warfare, and violence. This perspectives article compares these two fields of scholarship and examines how each may benefit the other. It finds significant convergences in methods and insights across contemporary and historical research as well as persistent patterns in causal pathways between climate and conflict. Contemporary climate, peace, and conflict (CPC) research may sharpen methods and causal models for historical researchers. Historical studies, particularly those informed by contemporary research, may elucidate deep origins and long-term effects of climate-related conflicts. For policymakers and the public, history offers comprehensible ways to make sense of complex and contingent linkages and to construct cogent narratives of the past as well as storylines for the future.
| 原文 | 英語 |
|---|---|
| 文章編號 | e518 |
| 頁(從 - 到) | 774-792 |
| 頁數 | 19 |
| 期刊 | Ambio |
| 卷 | 54 |
| 發行號 | 5 |
| DOIs | |
| 出版狀態 | 已發佈 - 2025 5月 |
UN SDG
此研究成果有助於以下永續發展目標
-
SDG 13 氣候行動
-
SDG 16 和平、正義與強韌的制度
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- 地理、規劃與發展
- 環境化學
- 生態學
指紋
深入研究「Climate, peace, and conflict—past and present: Bridging insights from historical sciences and contemporary research」主題。共同形成了獨特的指紋。引用此
- APA
- Standard
- Harvard
- Vancouver
- Author
- BIBTEX
- RIS