TY - JOUR
T1 - Assessing Students’ Deep Conceptual Understanding in Physical Sciences
T2 - an Example on Sinking and Floating
AU - Shen, Ji
AU - Liu, Ou Lydia
AU - Chang, Hsin Yi
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2015, Ministry of Science and Technology, Taiwan.
PY - 2017/1/1
Y1 - 2017/1/1
N2 - This paper presents a transformative modeling framework that guides the development of assessment to measure students’ deep understanding in physical sciences. The framework emphasizes 3 types of connections that students need to make when learning physical sciences: (1) linking physical states, processes, and explanatory models, (2) integrating multiple explanatory models, and (3) connecting scientific models to concrete experiences. We carried out a 2-phase exploratory study that helped further develop and refine the framework. In the first phase, we developed 3 items on sinking and floating and pilot tested them with 18 undergraduate students. Analysis of student responses revealed various student misconceptions and the different connections students made among science ideas. Based on the findings, we revised the assessment, modified the instruction, and collected data from another cohort of 26 students. The second cohort of students showed significant improvement of understanding of sinking and floating after instruction. Implications and limitations of how our assessment framework can be used to improve students’ conceptual understanding in science are discussed.
AB - This paper presents a transformative modeling framework that guides the development of assessment to measure students’ deep understanding in physical sciences. The framework emphasizes 3 types of connections that students need to make when learning physical sciences: (1) linking physical states, processes, and explanatory models, (2) integrating multiple explanatory models, and (3) connecting scientific models to concrete experiences. We carried out a 2-phase exploratory study that helped further develop and refine the framework. In the first phase, we developed 3 items on sinking and floating and pilot tested them with 18 undergraduate students. Analysis of student responses revealed various student misconceptions and the different connections students made among science ideas. Based on the findings, we revised the assessment, modified the instruction, and collected data from another cohort of 26 students. The second cohort of students showed significant improvement of understanding of sinking and floating after instruction. Implications and limitations of how our assessment framework can be used to improve students’ conceptual understanding in science are discussed.
KW - Explanatory models
KW - Modeling assessment
KW - Physical science
KW - Sinking and floating
KW - Transformative
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84944706445&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84944706445&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1007/s10763-015-9680-z
DO - 10.1007/s10763-015-9680-z
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:84944706445
SN - 1571-0068
VL - 15
SP - 57
EP - 70
JO - International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education
JF - International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education
IS - 1
ER -