TY - JOUR
T1 - Are there differences between science and engineering majors regarding the imagination-mediated model?
AU - Yueh, Hsiu Ping
AU - Chang, Chi Cheng
AU - Liang, Chaoyun
N1 - Funding Information:
The current study is part of the research project (NSC100-2511-S-155-005-MY2) supported by Taiwan's National Science Council. The authors would like to acknowledge Wei-Sheng Lin for his valuable contributions in statistical analysis. The authors would also like to extend their gratitude to the insightful suggestions of anonymous Thinking Skills and Creativity reviewers.
PY - 2013/12
Y1 - 2013/12
N2 - The current study is aimed at analyzing how selected personal and contextual factors influence academic performance through their impact on imagination, and comparing differences between the imagination-mediated model of science majors and that of engineering majors. The participants were a sample of 876 undergrads which were divided into science and engineering groups. An analysis of structural equation modeling was used to test all the hypotheses proposed. The results showed that the initiating imagination of the science group had a negative and direct effect on their academic performance, whereas the conceiving imagination of the science group had a positive and direct effect. The transforming imagination indirectly influenced academic performance. Through the mediator effect of imagination, self-efficacy, generative cognition and conscientiousness had strong effects on the academic performance of both science and engineering majors. The results also indicated that the imagination-mediated models of both science and engineering groups were similar, but each variable had different influences. The major differences between these two models were the effects resulting from initiating imagination, conceiving imagination, self-efficacy, and conscientiousness on students' academic performance. The results will be appreciated and the instructional strategies will be developed under the premise that imagination and creativity are valuable to science and engineering education.
AB - The current study is aimed at analyzing how selected personal and contextual factors influence academic performance through their impact on imagination, and comparing differences between the imagination-mediated model of science majors and that of engineering majors. The participants were a sample of 876 undergrads which were divided into science and engineering groups. An analysis of structural equation modeling was used to test all the hypotheses proposed. The results showed that the initiating imagination of the science group had a negative and direct effect on their academic performance, whereas the conceiving imagination of the science group had a positive and direct effect. The transforming imagination indirectly influenced academic performance. Through the mediator effect of imagination, self-efficacy, generative cognition and conscientiousness had strong effects on the academic performance of both science and engineering majors. The results also indicated that the imagination-mediated models of both science and engineering groups were similar, but each variable had different influences. The major differences between these two models were the effects resulting from initiating imagination, conceiving imagination, self-efficacy, and conscientiousness on students' academic performance. The results will be appreciated and the instructional strategies will be developed under the premise that imagination and creativity are valuable to science and engineering education.
KW - Academic performance
KW - Engineering education
KW - Imagination
KW - Science education
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84886285451&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84886285451&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.tsc.2013.07.004
DO - 10.1016/j.tsc.2013.07.004
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:84886285451
SN - 1871-1871
VL - 10
SP - 79
EP - 90
JO - Thinking Skills and Creativity
JF - Thinking Skills and Creativity
ER -