Analogical reasoning for diagnosing strategic issues in dynamic and complex environments

Kent D. Miller, Shu Jou Lin*


研究成果: 雜誌貢獻期刊論文同行評審

28 引文 斯高帕斯(Scopus)


Organizations interpret their environments by categorizing strategic issues as either opportunities or threats. They make such categorizations as inferences drawn from analogies from past experience. The accuracy of issue interpretations turns on: (1) which analogy is used, (2) what are the environment's properties, and (3) what is the timeframe? A computational model allows us to evaluate over time the accuracy of interpretations based on different forms of analogical reasoning in environments that differ in variation (unpredictability and dynamism) and complexity (dimensionality and ruggedness). This study elaborates a contingency approach to assessing analogical reasoning by organizations in which the form of analogical reasoning, environmental properties, and time all matter. Our findings indicate when particular forms of reasoning produce relatively more accurate inferences about opportunities and threats.

頁(從 - 到)2000-2020
期刊Strategic Management Journal
出版狀態已發佈 - 2015 12月

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • 商業與國際管理
  • 策略與管理


深入研究「Analogical reasoning for diagnosing strategic issues in dynamic and complex environments」主題。共同形成了獨特的指紋。