About the Canon of scholarship in East Asian ecocriticism

Hannes Bergthaller*

*此作品的通信作者

研究成果: 雜誌貢獻期刊論文同行評審

摘要

In his article "About the Canon of Scholarship in East Asian Ecocriticism" Hannes Bergthaller begins with the premise that ecocritical scholarship often locates the roots of environmental crisis in Western modernity and that it looks towards pre-modern or non-European traditions for a remedy. Bergthaller argues that such forms of cultural critique tend to reiterate a quintessentially modern gesture. Following Niklas Luhmann's account of culture, Bergthaller examines how these reiterations functions as a semantic mechanism for coping with the contingency of social forms. To describe a social practice as cultural, Bergthaller contends, is to valorize it as a marker of group identity and to highlight the fact that it could also be otherwise; moreover, to gauge the ecological relevance of cultural differences, these differences must be viewed against the background of modern world society, which has evolved structures that are largely indifferent to them. This insight is important for East Asian ecocriticism and Bergthaller's discussion contributes to the debate of the Western canon in East Asian ecocritical studies.

原文英語
期刊CLCWeb - Comparative Literature and Culture
16
發行號6
DOIs
出版狀態已發佈 - 2014
對外發佈

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • 文化學習
  • 文學與文學理論

指紋

深入研究「About the Canon of scholarship in East Asian ecocriticism」主題。共同形成了獨特的指紋。

引用此