When do efficiency and flexibility determine a firm's performance? A simulation study

Fred Phillips, Jinwon Chang, Yu Shan Su

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

3 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Purpose: Using general systems theory, we present a series of simulations that shed light on the viability of business strategies in stable and turbulent business environments. Special attention is given to the impact of efficiency versus flexibility on firm performance, and on what the simulations reveal concerning successful strategies in each environment and firm type. Design/methodology/approach: Large-scale Monte Carlo simulations based on Ashby's Requisite Variety principle. Findings: Efficiency and flexibility do not, in general, determine performance. However, certain strategies appear to be superior, and in turbulent business environments, efficiency and flexibility appear well correlated with firm performance. Research limitations/implications: Implications and limitations of the Law of Requisite Variety for strategic analysis are set forth. Limitations stem from the simplifications needed for quantitative analysis, and lack of explicit consideration of competitors’ actions. Practical implications: The simulations’ realism offers insights to strategists regarding the roles of efficiency and flexibility in firm performance. The quantitative approach provides unambiguous definitions for some terms used in strategy, sharpening concepts put forth by Ashby and by Ansoff. Originality/value: A back-to-basics, systems approach to the simulations, using the venerable and general requisite variety principle as its basis, ensures sound analysis and appeal to readers who may come to it from diverse traditions of strategy theory. The quantitative simulation tool is made available for other researchers to test and extend.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)88-96
Number of pages9
JournalJournal of Innovation and Knowledge
Volume4
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2019 Apr 1

Fingerprint

Industry
System theory
Acoustic waves
Simulation
Simulation study
Firm performance
Chemical analysis
Requisite variety
Business environment
Monte Carlo simulation
Realism
Systems approach
Strategy theory
Strategic analysis
General systems theory
Design methodology
Viability
Quantitative analysis
Business strategy
Competitors

Keywords

  • Corporate slack
  • Efficiency
  • Nimble firm
  • Requisite variety
  • Simulation
  • Strategy

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Management of Technology and Innovation
  • Business and International Management
  • Economics and Econometrics
  • Marketing

Cite this

When do efficiency and flexibility determine a firm's performance? A simulation study. / Phillips, Fred; Chang, Jinwon; Su, Yu Shan.

In: Journal of Innovation and Knowledge, Vol. 4, No. 2, 01.04.2019, p. 88-96.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{0b38048d1c8449cfbd576621cedbc4a0,
title = "When do efficiency and flexibility determine a firm's performance? A simulation study",
abstract = "Purpose: Using general systems theory, we present a series of simulations that shed light on the viability of business strategies in stable and turbulent business environments. Special attention is given to the impact of efficiency versus flexibility on firm performance, and on what the simulations reveal concerning successful strategies in each environment and firm type. Design/methodology/approach: Large-scale Monte Carlo simulations based on Ashby's Requisite Variety principle. Findings: Efficiency and flexibility do not, in general, determine performance. However, certain strategies appear to be superior, and in turbulent business environments, efficiency and flexibility appear well correlated with firm performance. Research limitations/implications: Implications and limitations of the Law of Requisite Variety for strategic analysis are set forth. Limitations stem from the simplifications needed for quantitative analysis, and lack of explicit consideration of competitors’ actions. Practical implications: The simulations’ realism offers insights to strategists regarding the roles of efficiency and flexibility in firm performance. The quantitative approach provides unambiguous definitions for some terms used in strategy, sharpening concepts put forth by Ashby and by Ansoff. Originality/value: A back-to-basics, systems approach to the simulations, using the venerable and general requisite variety principle as its basis, ensures sound analysis and appeal to readers who may come to it from diverse traditions of strategy theory. The quantitative simulation tool is made available for other researchers to test and extend.",
keywords = "Corporate slack, Efficiency, Nimble firm, Requisite variety, Simulation, Strategy",
author = "Fred Phillips and Jinwon Chang and Su, {Yu Shan}",
year = "2019",
month = "4",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.jik.2017.12.003",
language = "English",
volume = "4",
pages = "88--96",
journal = "Journal of Innovation and Knowledge",
issn = "2530-7614",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - When do efficiency and flexibility determine a firm's performance? A simulation study

AU - Phillips, Fred

AU - Chang, Jinwon

AU - Su, Yu Shan

PY - 2019/4/1

Y1 - 2019/4/1

N2 - Purpose: Using general systems theory, we present a series of simulations that shed light on the viability of business strategies in stable and turbulent business environments. Special attention is given to the impact of efficiency versus flexibility on firm performance, and on what the simulations reveal concerning successful strategies in each environment and firm type. Design/methodology/approach: Large-scale Monte Carlo simulations based on Ashby's Requisite Variety principle. Findings: Efficiency and flexibility do not, in general, determine performance. However, certain strategies appear to be superior, and in turbulent business environments, efficiency and flexibility appear well correlated with firm performance. Research limitations/implications: Implications and limitations of the Law of Requisite Variety for strategic analysis are set forth. Limitations stem from the simplifications needed for quantitative analysis, and lack of explicit consideration of competitors’ actions. Practical implications: The simulations’ realism offers insights to strategists regarding the roles of efficiency and flexibility in firm performance. The quantitative approach provides unambiguous definitions for some terms used in strategy, sharpening concepts put forth by Ashby and by Ansoff. Originality/value: A back-to-basics, systems approach to the simulations, using the venerable and general requisite variety principle as its basis, ensures sound analysis and appeal to readers who may come to it from diverse traditions of strategy theory. The quantitative simulation tool is made available for other researchers to test and extend.

AB - Purpose: Using general systems theory, we present a series of simulations that shed light on the viability of business strategies in stable and turbulent business environments. Special attention is given to the impact of efficiency versus flexibility on firm performance, and on what the simulations reveal concerning successful strategies in each environment and firm type. Design/methodology/approach: Large-scale Monte Carlo simulations based on Ashby's Requisite Variety principle. Findings: Efficiency and flexibility do not, in general, determine performance. However, certain strategies appear to be superior, and in turbulent business environments, efficiency and flexibility appear well correlated with firm performance. Research limitations/implications: Implications and limitations of the Law of Requisite Variety for strategic analysis are set forth. Limitations stem from the simplifications needed for quantitative analysis, and lack of explicit consideration of competitors’ actions. Practical implications: The simulations’ realism offers insights to strategists regarding the roles of efficiency and flexibility in firm performance. The quantitative approach provides unambiguous definitions for some terms used in strategy, sharpening concepts put forth by Ashby and by Ansoff. Originality/value: A back-to-basics, systems approach to the simulations, using the venerable and general requisite variety principle as its basis, ensures sound analysis and appeal to readers who may come to it from diverse traditions of strategy theory. The quantitative simulation tool is made available for other researchers to test and extend.

KW - Corporate slack

KW - Efficiency

KW - Nimble firm

KW - Requisite variety

KW - Simulation

KW - Strategy

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85064640337&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85064640337&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.jik.2017.12.003

DO - 10.1016/j.jik.2017.12.003

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:85064640337

VL - 4

SP - 88

EP - 96

JO - Journal of Innovation and Knowledge

JF - Journal of Innovation and Knowledge

SN - 2530-7614

IS - 2

ER -