Abstract
Surveys are frequently employed in needs assessment to collect information about gaps (the needs) in what is and what should be conditions. Double-scale Likert-type instruments are routinely used for this purpose. Although in accord with the discrepancy definition of need, the quality of such measures is being questioned to the point of suggesting that the results are not to be trusted. Eight factors supporting that proposition are described with explanations of how they operate. Literature-based examples are provided for improving surveys with double scales especially as they relate to attenuating the effects of the factors. Lastly, lessons learned are offered with a call for more research into this issue in assessing needs.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 607-619 |
Number of pages | 13 |
Journal | American Journal of Evaluation |
Volume | 43 |
Issue number | 4 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - 2022 Dec |
Keywords
- double-scaled needs assessments
- needs assessment surveys
- trustworthiness of results
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- Business and International Management
- Social Psychology
- Health(social science)
- Education
- Sociology and Political Science
- Strategy and Management