The wild boar as a driver of human-wildlife conflict in the protected park lands of Nepal

Pramod Pandey, Pei-Jen Lee, Hari Prasad Sharma

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

5 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Long-term success of conservation in protected areas requires the cooperation and participation from local people, especially in developing countries where local people often endure most of the cost from human-wildlife conflict. This study investigated crop damage due to wildlife in Thanapati Village adjacent to Shivapuri Nagarjun National Park, Nepal. Household interviews and field measurements were conducted between March 2009 and April 2010 to quantify the actual area damaged by crop-raiding wildlife and the associated economic loss. Of the seven wildlife groups evaluated, we identified the wild boar as the primary crop raider, which is in agreement with several previous studies in the Indo-Himalaya region. Approximately US$24,000 (9 % of the expected profit) were lost to wildlife damage annually, with c. 0.28 km2 (8 % of the farmlands) of crops damaged. We found that the local people’s assessment of the primary crop raider (i.e., wild boar) and the area damaged by wildlife to be quite accurate. Considering the ecology of the wild boar (e.g., tolerant to human activities, striving along the edge of habitats, consuming as well as trampling of crops) and the socioeconomic situation in the surrounding villages of Shivapuri Nagarjun National Park (e.g., resource-dependent economy, small farmers), we believe the solution to reduce human-wildlife conflict in this case lies in the following: (1) the use of innovative methods to deter wild boars; (2) active management of population size and carrying capacity of wild boars, possibly through regulated hunting; and (3) a fair compensation scheme or alternative economic means to offset crop damage.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)103-108
Number of pages6
JournalEuropean Journal of Wildlife Research
Volume62
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2016 Feb 1

Fingerprint

human-wildlife relations
wild boars
Nepal
wildlife
crops
crop damage
crop
villages
national parks
wildlife damage management
economics
national park
village
carrying capacity
edge effects
profits and margins
socioeconomics
developing countries
agricultural land
trampling

Keywords

  • Crop damage
  • Human livelihood
  • Net area damage
  • Sus scrofa

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics
  • Nature and Landscape Conservation
  • Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law

Cite this

The wild boar as a driver of human-wildlife conflict in the protected park lands of Nepal. / Pandey, Pramod; Lee, Pei-Jen; Sharma, Hari Prasad.

In: European Journal of Wildlife Research, Vol. 62, No. 1, 01.02.2016, p. 103-108.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{e51572ee09f14c14b1f7d3514f7dc104,
title = "The wild boar as a driver of human-wildlife conflict in the protected park lands of Nepal",
abstract = "Long-term success of conservation in protected areas requires the cooperation and participation from local people, especially in developing countries where local people often endure most of the cost from human-wildlife conflict. This study investigated crop damage due to wildlife in Thanapati Village adjacent to Shivapuri Nagarjun National Park, Nepal. Household interviews and field measurements were conducted between March 2009 and April 2010 to quantify the actual area damaged by crop-raiding wildlife and the associated economic loss. Of the seven wildlife groups evaluated, we identified the wild boar as the primary crop raider, which is in agreement with several previous studies in the Indo-Himalaya region. Approximately US$24,000 (9 {\%} of the expected profit) were lost to wildlife damage annually, with c. 0.28 km2 (8 {\%} of the farmlands) of crops damaged. We found that the local people’s assessment of the primary crop raider (i.e., wild boar) and the area damaged by wildlife to be quite accurate. Considering the ecology of the wild boar (e.g., tolerant to human activities, striving along the edge of habitats, consuming as well as trampling of crops) and the socioeconomic situation in the surrounding villages of Shivapuri Nagarjun National Park (e.g., resource-dependent economy, small farmers), we believe the solution to reduce human-wildlife conflict in this case lies in the following: (1) the use of innovative methods to deter wild boars; (2) active management of population size and carrying capacity of wild boars, possibly through regulated hunting; and (3) a fair compensation scheme or alternative economic means to offset crop damage.",
keywords = "Crop damage, Human livelihood, Net area damage, Sus scrofa",
author = "Pramod Pandey and Pei-Jen Lee and Sharma, {Hari Prasad}",
year = "2016",
month = "2",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1007/s10344-015-0978-5",
language = "English",
volume = "62",
pages = "103--108",
journal = "European Journal of Wildlife Research",
issn = "1612-4642",
publisher = "Springer Verlag",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - The wild boar as a driver of human-wildlife conflict in the protected park lands of Nepal

AU - Pandey, Pramod

AU - Lee, Pei-Jen

AU - Sharma, Hari Prasad

PY - 2016/2/1

Y1 - 2016/2/1

N2 - Long-term success of conservation in protected areas requires the cooperation and participation from local people, especially in developing countries where local people often endure most of the cost from human-wildlife conflict. This study investigated crop damage due to wildlife in Thanapati Village adjacent to Shivapuri Nagarjun National Park, Nepal. Household interviews and field measurements were conducted between March 2009 and April 2010 to quantify the actual area damaged by crop-raiding wildlife and the associated economic loss. Of the seven wildlife groups evaluated, we identified the wild boar as the primary crop raider, which is in agreement with several previous studies in the Indo-Himalaya region. Approximately US$24,000 (9 % of the expected profit) were lost to wildlife damage annually, with c. 0.28 km2 (8 % of the farmlands) of crops damaged. We found that the local people’s assessment of the primary crop raider (i.e., wild boar) and the area damaged by wildlife to be quite accurate. Considering the ecology of the wild boar (e.g., tolerant to human activities, striving along the edge of habitats, consuming as well as trampling of crops) and the socioeconomic situation in the surrounding villages of Shivapuri Nagarjun National Park (e.g., resource-dependent economy, small farmers), we believe the solution to reduce human-wildlife conflict in this case lies in the following: (1) the use of innovative methods to deter wild boars; (2) active management of population size and carrying capacity of wild boars, possibly through regulated hunting; and (3) a fair compensation scheme or alternative economic means to offset crop damage.

AB - Long-term success of conservation in protected areas requires the cooperation and participation from local people, especially in developing countries where local people often endure most of the cost from human-wildlife conflict. This study investigated crop damage due to wildlife in Thanapati Village adjacent to Shivapuri Nagarjun National Park, Nepal. Household interviews and field measurements were conducted between March 2009 and April 2010 to quantify the actual area damaged by crop-raiding wildlife and the associated economic loss. Of the seven wildlife groups evaluated, we identified the wild boar as the primary crop raider, which is in agreement with several previous studies in the Indo-Himalaya region. Approximately US$24,000 (9 % of the expected profit) were lost to wildlife damage annually, with c. 0.28 km2 (8 % of the farmlands) of crops damaged. We found that the local people’s assessment of the primary crop raider (i.e., wild boar) and the area damaged by wildlife to be quite accurate. Considering the ecology of the wild boar (e.g., tolerant to human activities, striving along the edge of habitats, consuming as well as trampling of crops) and the socioeconomic situation in the surrounding villages of Shivapuri Nagarjun National Park (e.g., resource-dependent economy, small farmers), we believe the solution to reduce human-wildlife conflict in this case lies in the following: (1) the use of innovative methods to deter wild boars; (2) active management of population size and carrying capacity of wild boars, possibly through regulated hunting; and (3) a fair compensation scheme or alternative economic means to offset crop damage.

KW - Crop damage

KW - Human livelihood

KW - Net area damage

KW - Sus scrofa

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84956616521&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84956616521&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/s10344-015-0978-5

DO - 10.1007/s10344-015-0978-5

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:84956616521

VL - 62

SP - 103

EP - 108

JO - European Journal of Wildlife Research

JF - European Journal of Wildlife Research

SN - 1612-4642

IS - 1

ER -