TY - GEN
T1 - The tools related to mathematics teachers' pedagogical reasoning
T2 - 7th International Conference on Higher Education Advances, HEAd 2021
AU - Yang, Kai Lin
AU - Tambunan, Siska Nopa Br
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2021. International Conference on Higher Education Advances. All rights reserved.
PY - 2021
Y1 - 2021
N2 - Shulman (1987) introduced pedagogical reasoning in his model of pedagogical reasoning and action, refers to the phases of activities involving comprehension, transformation, instruction, evaluation, and reflection. The present study aims at a critical review on the tools for investigating the phases of pedagogical reasoning and action for mathematics teachers. Based on a focused search in the database Scopus, 13 articles were reviewed. Findings showed three categories included mathematical tasks, teaching materials and videos. We further classified each category and connected it with Shulman's phases of pedagogical reasoning. Mathematical tasks are classified as pure mathematical tasks and mathematical pedagogical tasks which can be connected to comprehension and transformation phases. Teaching materials are classified into three sub-categories, including materials in planning session, in implementation session, and after implementation which can be connected to comprehension and transformation, instruction, and evaluation and reflection phases, respectively. Lastly, videos are classified into three subcategories including video of self-teaching, others teaching, and movie which connected to evaluation and reflection phases. Two findings are highlighted including (1) the correspondence between the tools for pedagogical reasoning and Shulman's phases of pedagogical reasoning and (2) the features of each sub-category of the tools related to pedagogical reasoning.
AB - Shulman (1987) introduced pedagogical reasoning in his model of pedagogical reasoning and action, refers to the phases of activities involving comprehension, transformation, instruction, evaluation, and reflection. The present study aims at a critical review on the tools for investigating the phases of pedagogical reasoning and action for mathematics teachers. Based on a focused search in the database Scopus, 13 articles were reviewed. Findings showed three categories included mathematical tasks, teaching materials and videos. We further classified each category and connected it with Shulman's phases of pedagogical reasoning. Mathematical tasks are classified as pure mathematical tasks and mathematical pedagogical tasks which can be connected to comprehension and transformation phases. Teaching materials are classified into three sub-categories, including materials in planning session, in implementation session, and after implementation which can be connected to comprehension and transformation, instruction, and evaluation and reflection phases, respectively. Lastly, videos are classified into three subcategories including video of self-teaching, others teaching, and movie which connected to evaluation and reflection phases. Two findings are highlighted including (1) the correspondence between the tools for pedagogical reasoning and Shulman's phases of pedagogical reasoning and (2) the features of each sub-category of the tools related to pedagogical reasoning.
KW - Mathematics teachers
KW - pedagogical reasoning
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85128408869&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85128408869&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.4995/HEAd21.2021.12698
DO - 10.4995/HEAd21.2021.12698
M3 - Conference contribution
AN - SCOPUS:85128408869
T3 - International Conference on Higher Education Advances
SP - 129
EP - 136
BT - HEAd 2021 - 7th International Conference on Higher Education Advances
PB - Universidad Politecnica de Valencia.
Y2 - 22 June 2021 through 23 June 2021
ER -