The stabilizing effect of posterior fixations in a destabilized atlantoaxial complex model in canines

Ching Hong Chang, E. Jian Lee, Guan Liang Chang, Jia Hao Chang, Yu Chang Hung, Ming Yang Lee

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Purpose: This study was conducted to evaluate the kinematic responses and the restorative effectiveness of three posterior fixations in a canine atlantoaxial (C1-2) complex model. Methods: Nine canine ligamentous C1-2 complexes were non-destructively tested in an intact condition, after ligamentous destabilization, and after bilateral stabilization with each of three posterior fixation methods: (1) Halifax inter-laminar clamps; (2) sub-laminar wiring; and (3) individual fixation of the C1 lateral mass and the C2 pedicle with screws and plates. Specimens were subjected to a relevantly applied loads through a loading frame rigidly attached to the C1. Two sets of three markers was separately attached to the mounting jigs of the C1 and the C2 to record the spatial locations after each loading step with a Vicron 370 system. The load-deformation data were analyzed. Results: Under a realistic loading paradigm, destabilized canine C1-2 complex had 3-dimensional motion ranges highly consistent with the corresponding values observed in destabilized cadaveric human C1-2 complex following a non-destructive loading paradigm. All the three posterior fixations significantly restricted the motion range of axial rotation loads (P < 0.05). However, fixation either with posterior inter-articular screws and plates or inter-laminar clamps also effectively restricted the motion ranges of flexion/extension and lateral bending loads, whereas posterior wiring did not. Conclusion: We described a destabilized canine C1-2 complex model. Under a realistic loading paradigm, the model had kinematic analogue of destabilized human C1-2 complex. Our results indicated that posterior stabilization using inter-articular fixation techniques or inter-laminar clamps could effectively restrict hypermotility caused by C1-2 ligamentous destabilization, and, therefore, appeared to be reliable fixation methods. In contrast, posterior wiring alone would preserve more residual motions, and, thus, might need other adjunctive fixations to offer an optimal condition for solid bony fusion.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)211-219
Number of pages9
JournalJournal of Musculoskeletal Research
Volume7
Issue number3-4
Publication statusPublished - 2003 Sep 1

Fingerprint

Canidae
Articular Range of Motion
Biomechanical Phenomena
Joints

Keywords

  • Atlantoaxial instability
  • Halifax inter-laminar clamps
  • Posterior lateral inter-articular fixation
  • Posterior wiring

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Orthopedics and Sports Medicine

Cite this

The stabilizing effect of posterior fixations in a destabilized atlantoaxial complex model in canines. / Chang, Ching Hong; Lee, E. Jian; Chang, Guan Liang; Chang, Jia Hao; Hung, Yu Chang; Lee, Ming Yang.

In: Journal of Musculoskeletal Research, Vol. 7, No. 3-4, 01.09.2003, p. 211-219.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Chang, Ching Hong ; Lee, E. Jian ; Chang, Guan Liang ; Chang, Jia Hao ; Hung, Yu Chang ; Lee, Ming Yang. / The stabilizing effect of posterior fixations in a destabilized atlantoaxial complex model in canines. In: Journal of Musculoskeletal Research. 2003 ; Vol. 7, No. 3-4. pp. 211-219.
@article{0f3cea643e1945199cfb147ca46897f2,
title = "The stabilizing effect of posterior fixations in a destabilized atlantoaxial complex model in canines",
abstract = "Purpose: This study was conducted to evaluate the kinematic responses and the restorative effectiveness of three posterior fixations in a canine atlantoaxial (C1-2) complex model. Methods: Nine canine ligamentous C1-2 complexes were non-destructively tested in an intact condition, after ligamentous destabilization, and after bilateral stabilization with each of three posterior fixation methods: (1) Halifax inter-laminar clamps; (2) sub-laminar wiring; and (3) individual fixation of the C1 lateral mass and the C2 pedicle with screws and plates. Specimens were subjected to a relevantly applied loads through a loading frame rigidly attached to the C1. Two sets of three markers was separately attached to the mounting jigs of the C1 and the C2 to record the spatial locations after each loading step with a Vicron 370 system. The load-deformation data were analyzed. Results: Under a realistic loading paradigm, destabilized canine C1-2 complex had 3-dimensional motion ranges highly consistent with the corresponding values observed in destabilized cadaveric human C1-2 complex following a non-destructive loading paradigm. All the three posterior fixations significantly restricted the motion range of axial rotation loads (P < 0.05). However, fixation either with posterior inter-articular screws and plates or inter-laminar clamps also effectively restricted the motion ranges of flexion/extension and lateral bending loads, whereas posterior wiring did not. Conclusion: We described a destabilized canine C1-2 complex model. Under a realistic loading paradigm, the model had kinematic analogue of destabilized human C1-2 complex. Our results indicated that posterior stabilization using inter-articular fixation techniques or inter-laminar clamps could effectively restrict hypermotility caused by C1-2 ligamentous destabilization, and, therefore, appeared to be reliable fixation methods. In contrast, posterior wiring alone would preserve more residual motions, and, thus, might need other adjunctive fixations to offer an optimal condition for solid bony fusion.",
keywords = "Atlantoaxial instability, Halifax inter-laminar clamps, Posterior lateral inter-articular fixation, Posterior wiring",
author = "Chang, {Ching Hong} and Lee, {E. Jian} and Chang, {Guan Liang} and Chang, {Jia Hao} and Hung, {Yu Chang} and Lee, {Ming Yang}",
year = "2003",
month = "9",
day = "1",
language = "English",
volume = "7",
pages = "211--219",
journal = "Journal of Musculoskeletal Research",
issn = "0218-9577",
publisher = "World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte Ltd",
number = "3-4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - The stabilizing effect of posterior fixations in a destabilized atlantoaxial complex model in canines

AU - Chang, Ching Hong

AU - Lee, E. Jian

AU - Chang, Guan Liang

AU - Chang, Jia Hao

AU - Hung, Yu Chang

AU - Lee, Ming Yang

PY - 2003/9/1

Y1 - 2003/9/1

N2 - Purpose: This study was conducted to evaluate the kinematic responses and the restorative effectiveness of three posterior fixations in a canine atlantoaxial (C1-2) complex model. Methods: Nine canine ligamentous C1-2 complexes were non-destructively tested in an intact condition, after ligamentous destabilization, and after bilateral stabilization with each of three posterior fixation methods: (1) Halifax inter-laminar clamps; (2) sub-laminar wiring; and (3) individual fixation of the C1 lateral mass and the C2 pedicle with screws and plates. Specimens were subjected to a relevantly applied loads through a loading frame rigidly attached to the C1. Two sets of three markers was separately attached to the mounting jigs of the C1 and the C2 to record the spatial locations after each loading step with a Vicron 370 system. The load-deformation data were analyzed. Results: Under a realistic loading paradigm, destabilized canine C1-2 complex had 3-dimensional motion ranges highly consistent with the corresponding values observed in destabilized cadaveric human C1-2 complex following a non-destructive loading paradigm. All the three posterior fixations significantly restricted the motion range of axial rotation loads (P < 0.05). However, fixation either with posterior inter-articular screws and plates or inter-laminar clamps also effectively restricted the motion ranges of flexion/extension and lateral bending loads, whereas posterior wiring did not. Conclusion: We described a destabilized canine C1-2 complex model. Under a realistic loading paradigm, the model had kinematic analogue of destabilized human C1-2 complex. Our results indicated that posterior stabilization using inter-articular fixation techniques or inter-laminar clamps could effectively restrict hypermotility caused by C1-2 ligamentous destabilization, and, therefore, appeared to be reliable fixation methods. In contrast, posterior wiring alone would preserve more residual motions, and, thus, might need other adjunctive fixations to offer an optimal condition for solid bony fusion.

AB - Purpose: This study was conducted to evaluate the kinematic responses and the restorative effectiveness of three posterior fixations in a canine atlantoaxial (C1-2) complex model. Methods: Nine canine ligamentous C1-2 complexes were non-destructively tested in an intact condition, after ligamentous destabilization, and after bilateral stabilization with each of three posterior fixation methods: (1) Halifax inter-laminar clamps; (2) sub-laminar wiring; and (3) individual fixation of the C1 lateral mass and the C2 pedicle with screws and plates. Specimens were subjected to a relevantly applied loads through a loading frame rigidly attached to the C1. Two sets of three markers was separately attached to the mounting jigs of the C1 and the C2 to record the spatial locations after each loading step with a Vicron 370 system. The load-deformation data were analyzed. Results: Under a realistic loading paradigm, destabilized canine C1-2 complex had 3-dimensional motion ranges highly consistent with the corresponding values observed in destabilized cadaveric human C1-2 complex following a non-destructive loading paradigm. All the three posterior fixations significantly restricted the motion range of axial rotation loads (P < 0.05). However, fixation either with posterior inter-articular screws and plates or inter-laminar clamps also effectively restricted the motion ranges of flexion/extension and lateral bending loads, whereas posterior wiring did not. Conclusion: We described a destabilized canine C1-2 complex model. Under a realistic loading paradigm, the model had kinematic analogue of destabilized human C1-2 complex. Our results indicated that posterior stabilization using inter-articular fixation techniques or inter-laminar clamps could effectively restrict hypermotility caused by C1-2 ligamentous destabilization, and, therefore, appeared to be reliable fixation methods. In contrast, posterior wiring alone would preserve more residual motions, and, thus, might need other adjunctive fixations to offer an optimal condition for solid bony fusion.

KW - Atlantoaxial instability

KW - Halifax inter-laminar clamps

KW - Posterior lateral inter-articular fixation

KW - Posterior wiring

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0346403240&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0346403240&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:0346403240

VL - 7

SP - 211

EP - 219

JO - Journal of Musculoskeletal Research

JF - Journal of Musculoskeletal Research

SN - 0218-9577

IS - 3-4

ER -