The scientist’s ways in national science curricula: A comparative study between Taiwan and Vietnam

Viet Hai Nguyen*, Ping Han Cheng, Yu Hsuan Chien, Chun Yen Chang

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

1 Citation (Scopus)


Recent science education reforms center at having students learn the practices of scientists. In this study, we aim at exploring how science curricular documents reflect the latest updates from the “practice turn” reform. To do that, we utilize the notion of the scientist’s ways of doing science as a perspective to observe the distribution of components constituting scientific practices in national science curricula. Current literature provides several curriculum analysis frameworks based on taxonomies of cognitive demands or international tests. Still, those frameworks are either not intended for science curricula or limited in indicators and hence failed to capture an updating picture of science curricula that reflect the recent practice turn. We employ multiple case study research design and qualitative content analysis approach to compare learning outcomes in Taiwan and Vietnam’s two national science curricula. Results from this study offer maps of scientific practices across curricular documents and relevant suggestions for stakeholders to improve science curricula. The study opens a new direction on researching science curricula to make science learning approaching the scientist’s ways in reality.

Original languageEnglish
Article numberem2355
JournalEurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education
Issue number11
Publication statusPublished - 2023


  • comparison studies
  • curriculum analysis
  • learning outcomes
  • science curriculum
  • scientific & engineering practices

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Education
  • Applied Mathematics


Dive into the research topics of 'The scientist’s ways in national science curricula: A comparative study between Taiwan and Vietnam'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this