The same growth of FB and NR symmetric cone complementarity functions

Shujun Bi, Shaohua Pan, Jein-Shan Chen

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

5 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

We establish that the Fischer-Burmeister (FB) complementarity function and the natural residual (NR) complementarity function associated with the symmetric cone have the same growth, in terms of the classification of Euclidean Jordan algebras. This, on the one hand, provides an affirmative answer to the second open question proposed by Tseng (J Optim Theory Appl 89:17-37, 1996) for the matrix-valued FB and NR complementarity functions, and on the other hand, extends the third important inequality of Lemma 3. 1 in the aforementioned paper to the setting of Euclidean Jordan algebras. It is worthwhile to point out that the proof is surprisingly simple.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)153-162
Number of pages10
JournalOptimization Letters
Volume6
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2012 Jan 1

Fingerprint

Symmetric Cone
Complementarity
Euclidean Jordan Algebra
Lemma

Keywords

  • FB and NR complementarity functions
  • Growth
  • Symmetric cone

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Control and Optimization

Cite this

The same growth of FB and NR symmetric cone complementarity functions. / Bi, Shujun; Pan, Shaohua; Chen, Jein-Shan.

In: Optimization Letters, Vol. 6, No. 1, 01.01.2012, p. 153-162.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{fecf778fc5e24826ba0300cabb7bcec8,
title = "The same growth of FB and NR symmetric cone complementarity functions",
abstract = "We establish that the Fischer-Burmeister (FB) complementarity function and the natural residual (NR) complementarity function associated with the symmetric cone have the same growth, in terms of the classification of Euclidean Jordan algebras. This, on the one hand, provides an affirmative answer to the second open question proposed by Tseng (J Optim Theory Appl 89:17-37, 1996) for the matrix-valued FB and NR complementarity functions, and on the other hand, extends the third important inequality of Lemma 3. 1 in the aforementioned paper to the setting of Euclidean Jordan algebras. It is worthwhile to point out that the proof is surprisingly simple.",
keywords = "FB and NR complementarity functions, Growth, Symmetric cone",
author = "Shujun Bi and Shaohua Pan and Jein-Shan Chen",
year = "2012",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1007/s11590-010-0257-z",
language = "English",
volume = "6",
pages = "153--162",
journal = "Optimization Letters",
issn = "1862-4472",
publisher = "Springer Verlag",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - The same growth of FB and NR symmetric cone complementarity functions

AU - Bi, Shujun

AU - Pan, Shaohua

AU - Chen, Jein-Shan

PY - 2012/1/1

Y1 - 2012/1/1

N2 - We establish that the Fischer-Burmeister (FB) complementarity function and the natural residual (NR) complementarity function associated with the symmetric cone have the same growth, in terms of the classification of Euclidean Jordan algebras. This, on the one hand, provides an affirmative answer to the second open question proposed by Tseng (J Optim Theory Appl 89:17-37, 1996) for the matrix-valued FB and NR complementarity functions, and on the other hand, extends the third important inequality of Lemma 3. 1 in the aforementioned paper to the setting of Euclidean Jordan algebras. It is worthwhile to point out that the proof is surprisingly simple.

AB - We establish that the Fischer-Burmeister (FB) complementarity function and the natural residual (NR) complementarity function associated with the symmetric cone have the same growth, in terms of the classification of Euclidean Jordan algebras. This, on the one hand, provides an affirmative answer to the second open question proposed by Tseng (J Optim Theory Appl 89:17-37, 1996) for the matrix-valued FB and NR complementarity functions, and on the other hand, extends the third important inequality of Lemma 3. 1 in the aforementioned paper to the setting of Euclidean Jordan algebras. It is worthwhile to point out that the proof is surprisingly simple.

KW - FB and NR complementarity functions

KW - Growth

KW - Symmetric cone

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84855222569&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84855222569&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/s11590-010-0257-z

DO - 10.1007/s11590-010-0257-z

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:84855222569

VL - 6

SP - 153

EP - 162

JO - Optimization Letters

JF - Optimization Letters

SN - 1862-4472

IS - 1

ER -