The interplay between different forms of CAI and students' preferences of learning environment in the secondary science class

Chun Yen Chang*, Chin Chung Tsai

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

46 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

This evaluation study investigated the effects of a teacher-centered versus student-centered computer-assisted instruction (CAI) on 10th graders' earth science student learning outcomes. This study also explored whether the effects of different forms of computer-assisted instruction (CAI) on student learning outcomes were influenced by student preferences of learning environment (PLE). A total of 347 10th-grade senior high school students participated in this nonequivalent control group quasiexperiment. During a one-week period, one group of students (n = 216) were taught by a teacher-centered CAI (TCCAI) model whereas the other group of students (n = 131) were subject to a student-centered CAI (SCCAI) method. Results showed that (a) no statistically significant difference on students' earth science achievement was found for either group; (b) TCCAI group had significantly better attitudes toward earth science than did the SCCAI group; furthermore (c) a significant PLE-treatment interaction was found on student attitudes toward the subject matter, where the teacher-centered instructional approach seemed to enhance more positive attitudes of less constructivist-oriented learning preferences students, whereas the student-centered method was more beneficial to more constructivist-oriented learning preferences students on their attitudes toward earth science in a computer-assisted learning environment.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)707-724
Number of pages18
JournalScience Education
Volume89
Issue number5
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2005 Sept

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Education
  • History and Philosophy of Science

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'The interplay between different forms of CAI and students' preferences of learning environment in the secondary science class'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this