The Intellectual Structure of Research on Educational Technology in Science Education (ETiSE)

A Co-citation Network Analysis of Publications in Selected Journals (2008–2013)

Kai Yu Tang, Chin Chung Tsai

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

6 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The main purpose of this paper is to investigate the intellectual structure of the research on educational technology in science education (ETiSE) within the most recent years (2008–2013). Based on the criteria for educational technology research and the citation threshold for educational co-citation analysis, a total of 137 relevant ETiSE papers were identified from the International Journal of Science Education, the Journal of Research in Science Teaching, Science Education, and the Journal of Science Education and Technology. Then, a series of methodologies were performed to analyze all 137 source documents, including document co-citation analysis, social network analysis, and exploratory factor analysis. As a result, 454 co-citation ties were obtained and then graphically visualized with an undirected network, presenting a global structure of the current ETiSE research network. In addition, four major underlying intellectual subfields within the main component of the ETiSE network were extracted and named as: (1) technology-enhanced science inquiry, (2) simulation and visualization for understanding, (3) technology-enhanced chemistry learning, and (4) game-based science learning. The most influential co-citation pairs and cross-boundary phenomena were then analyzed and visualized in a co-citation network. This is the very first attempt to illuminate the core ideas underlying ETiSE research by integrating the co-citation method, factor analysis, and the networking visualization technique. The findings of this study provide a platform for scholarly discussion of the dissemination and research trends within the current ETiSE literature.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)327-344
Number of pages18
JournalJournal of Science Education and Technology
Volume25
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2016 Apr 1

Fingerprint

Educational technology
educational technology
Electric network analysis
network analysis
Education
science
education
Factor analysis
Visualization
visualization
factor analysis
Teaching
learning
networking
social network
chemistry

Keywords

  • Document co-citation analysis (DCA)
  • Educational technology in science education (ETiSE)
  • Exploratory factor analysis (EFA)
  • Literature review
  • Social network analysis (SNA)

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Education
  • Engineering(all)

Cite this

@article{693db3e2a41549128b506fbd14b8b41a,
title = "The Intellectual Structure of Research on Educational Technology in Science Education (ETiSE): A Co-citation Network Analysis of Publications in Selected Journals (2008–2013)",
abstract = "The main purpose of this paper is to investigate the intellectual structure of the research on educational technology in science education (ETiSE) within the most recent years (2008–2013). Based on the criteria for educational technology research and the citation threshold for educational co-citation analysis, a total of 137 relevant ETiSE papers were identified from the International Journal of Science Education, the Journal of Research in Science Teaching, Science Education, and the Journal of Science Education and Technology. Then, a series of methodologies were performed to analyze all 137 source documents, including document co-citation analysis, social network analysis, and exploratory factor analysis. As a result, 454 co-citation ties were obtained and then graphically visualized with an undirected network, presenting a global structure of the current ETiSE research network. In addition, four major underlying intellectual subfields within the main component of the ETiSE network were extracted and named as: (1) technology-enhanced science inquiry, (2) simulation and visualization for understanding, (3) technology-enhanced chemistry learning, and (4) game-based science learning. The most influential co-citation pairs and cross-boundary phenomena were then analyzed and visualized in a co-citation network. This is the very first attempt to illuminate the core ideas underlying ETiSE research by integrating the co-citation method, factor analysis, and the networking visualization technique. The findings of this study provide a platform for scholarly discussion of the dissemination and research trends within the current ETiSE literature.",
keywords = "Document co-citation analysis (DCA), Educational technology in science education (ETiSE), Exploratory factor analysis (EFA), Literature review, Social network analysis (SNA)",
author = "Tang, {Kai Yu} and Tsai, {Chin Chung}",
year = "2016",
month = "4",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1007/s10956-015-9596-y",
language = "English",
volume = "25",
pages = "327--344",
journal = "Journal of Science Education and Technology",
issn = "1059-0145",
publisher = "Springer Netherlands",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - The Intellectual Structure of Research on Educational Technology in Science Education (ETiSE)

T2 - A Co-citation Network Analysis of Publications in Selected Journals (2008–2013)

AU - Tang, Kai Yu

AU - Tsai, Chin Chung

PY - 2016/4/1

Y1 - 2016/4/1

N2 - The main purpose of this paper is to investigate the intellectual structure of the research on educational technology in science education (ETiSE) within the most recent years (2008–2013). Based on the criteria for educational technology research and the citation threshold for educational co-citation analysis, a total of 137 relevant ETiSE papers were identified from the International Journal of Science Education, the Journal of Research in Science Teaching, Science Education, and the Journal of Science Education and Technology. Then, a series of methodologies were performed to analyze all 137 source documents, including document co-citation analysis, social network analysis, and exploratory factor analysis. As a result, 454 co-citation ties were obtained and then graphically visualized with an undirected network, presenting a global structure of the current ETiSE research network. In addition, four major underlying intellectual subfields within the main component of the ETiSE network were extracted and named as: (1) technology-enhanced science inquiry, (2) simulation and visualization for understanding, (3) technology-enhanced chemistry learning, and (4) game-based science learning. The most influential co-citation pairs and cross-boundary phenomena were then analyzed and visualized in a co-citation network. This is the very first attempt to illuminate the core ideas underlying ETiSE research by integrating the co-citation method, factor analysis, and the networking visualization technique. The findings of this study provide a platform for scholarly discussion of the dissemination and research trends within the current ETiSE literature.

AB - The main purpose of this paper is to investigate the intellectual structure of the research on educational technology in science education (ETiSE) within the most recent years (2008–2013). Based on the criteria for educational technology research and the citation threshold for educational co-citation analysis, a total of 137 relevant ETiSE papers were identified from the International Journal of Science Education, the Journal of Research in Science Teaching, Science Education, and the Journal of Science Education and Technology. Then, a series of methodologies were performed to analyze all 137 source documents, including document co-citation analysis, social network analysis, and exploratory factor analysis. As a result, 454 co-citation ties were obtained and then graphically visualized with an undirected network, presenting a global structure of the current ETiSE research network. In addition, four major underlying intellectual subfields within the main component of the ETiSE network were extracted and named as: (1) technology-enhanced science inquiry, (2) simulation and visualization for understanding, (3) technology-enhanced chemistry learning, and (4) game-based science learning. The most influential co-citation pairs and cross-boundary phenomena were then analyzed and visualized in a co-citation network. This is the very first attempt to illuminate the core ideas underlying ETiSE research by integrating the co-citation method, factor analysis, and the networking visualization technique. The findings of this study provide a platform for scholarly discussion of the dissemination and research trends within the current ETiSE literature.

KW - Document co-citation analysis (DCA)

KW - Educational technology in science education (ETiSE)

KW - Exploratory factor analysis (EFA)

KW - Literature review

KW - Social network analysis (SNA)

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84960348415&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84960348415&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/s10956-015-9596-y

DO - 10.1007/s10956-015-9596-y

M3 - Review article

VL - 25

SP - 327

EP - 344

JO - Journal of Science Education and Technology

JF - Journal of Science Education and Technology

SN - 1059-0145

IS - 2

ER -