The Intellectual Structure of Metacognitive Scaffolding in Science Education: A Co-citation Network Analysis

Kai Yu Tang, Chia Yu Wang, Hsin Yi Chang, Sufen Chen, Hao Chang Lo, Chin Chung Tsai

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

9 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The issues of metacognitive scaffolding in science education (MSiSE) have become increasingly popular and important. Differing from previous content reviews, this study proposes a series of quantitative computer-based analyses by integrating document co-citation analysis, social network analysis, and exploratory factor analysis to explore the intellectual structure of the MSiSE literature (i.e. the relationships within and between subfields of MSiSE). Co-citation refers to any two articles that are jointly referenced in other articles. After the computation of co-citation analysis, 27 articles that have been co-cited at least once by follow-up studies as references were identified as the final set of core articles. The whole co-citation profile of 27 cores with the 434 links was then visualized in a network through social network analysis, representing an overview for the intellectual structure of core MSiSE studies. The most cross-referenced underpinnings in the network focused on adaptive scaffolding for self-regulated learning to enhance students’ conceptual understanding and on younger students’ metacognition in online science inquiry learning environments. Furthermore, two emerging topics in the network were identified through an exploratory factor analysis as “non-technological metacognitive scaffolding media,” and “behavior patterns & task analysis in technology-infused environments.” Overall, the study provides an innovative review method of scholarly communication in the MSiSE literature.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)249-262
Number of pages14
JournalInternational Journal of Science and Mathematics Education
Volume14
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2016 Mar 1

Fingerprint

Citation Analysis
Science Education
Network Analysis
network analysis
Exploratory Factor Analysis
science
Social Network Analysis
Citations
education
Metacognition
factor analysis
social network
Subfield
Learning Environment
behavior pattern
learning environment
student
Series
communication
learning

Keywords

  • Document co-citation analysis
  • Exploratory factor analysis
  • Literature review
  • Metacognitive scaffolding in science education (MSiSE)
  • Social network analysis

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Education
  • Mathematics(all)

Cite this

The Intellectual Structure of Metacognitive Scaffolding in Science Education : A Co-citation Network Analysis. / Tang, Kai Yu; Wang, Chia Yu; Chang, Hsin Yi; Chen, Sufen; Lo, Hao Chang; Tsai, Chin Chung.

In: International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, Vol. 14, No. 2, 01.03.2016, p. 249-262.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{406849cc8f8f45fcbc5acc21773d3548,
title = "The Intellectual Structure of Metacognitive Scaffolding in Science Education: A Co-citation Network Analysis",
abstract = "The issues of metacognitive scaffolding in science education (MSiSE) have become increasingly popular and important. Differing from previous content reviews, this study proposes a series of quantitative computer-based analyses by integrating document co-citation analysis, social network analysis, and exploratory factor analysis to explore the intellectual structure of the MSiSE literature (i.e. the relationships within and between subfields of MSiSE). Co-citation refers to any two articles that are jointly referenced in other articles. After the computation of co-citation analysis, 27 articles that have been co-cited at least once by follow-up studies as references were identified as the final set of core articles. The whole co-citation profile of 27 cores with the 434 links was then visualized in a network through social network analysis, representing an overview for the intellectual structure of core MSiSE studies. The most cross-referenced underpinnings in the network focused on adaptive scaffolding for self-regulated learning to enhance students’ conceptual understanding and on younger students’ metacognition in online science inquiry learning environments. Furthermore, two emerging topics in the network were identified through an exploratory factor analysis as “non-technological metacognitive scaffolding media,” and “behavior patterns & task analysis in technology-infused environments.” Overall, the study provides an innovative review method of scholarly communication in the MSiSE literature.",
keywords = "Document co-citation analysis, Exploratory factor analysis, Literature review, Metacognitive scaffolding in science education (MSiSE), Social network analysis",
author = "Tang, {Kai Yu} and Wang, {Chia Yu} and Chang, {Hsin Yi} and Sufen Chen and Lo, {Hao Chang} and Tsai, {Chin Chung}",
year = "2016",
month = "3",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1007/s10763-015-9696-4",
language = "English",
volume = "14",
pages = "249--262",
journal = "International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education",
issn = "1571-0068",
publisher = "Springer Netherlands",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - The Intellectual Structure of Metacognitive Scaffolding in Science Education

T2 - A Co-citation Network Analysis

AU - Tang, Kai Yu

AU - Wang, Chia Yu

AU - Chang, Hsin Yi

AU - Chen, Sufen

AU - Lo, Hao Chang

AU - Tsai, Chin Chung

PY - 2016/3/1

Y1 - 2016/3/1

N2 - The issues of metacognitive scaffolding in science education (MSiSE) have become increasingly popular and important. Differing from previous content reviews, this study proposes a series of quantitative computer-based analyses by integrating document co-citation analysis, social network analysis, and exploratory factor analysis to explore the intellectual structure of the MSiSE literature (i.e. the relationships within and between subfields of MSiSE). Co-citation refers to any two articles that are jointly referenced in other articles. After the computation of co-citation analysis, 27 articles that have been co-cited at least once by follow-up studies as references were identified as the final set of core articles. The whole co-citation profile of 27 cores with the 434 links was then visualized in a network through social network analysis, representing an overview for the intellectual structure of core MSiSE studies. The most cross-referenced underpinnings in the network focused on adaptive scaffolding for self-regulated learning to enhance students’ conceptual understanding and on younger students’ metacognition in online science inquiry learning environments. Furthermore, two emerging topics in the network were identified through an exploratory factor analysis as “non-technological metacognitive scaffolding media,” and “behavior patterns & task analysis in technology-infused environments.” Overall, the study provides an innovative review method of scholarly communication in the MSiSE literature.

AB - The issues of metacognitive scaffolding in science education (MSiSE) have become increasingly popular and important. Differing from previous content reviews, this study proposes a series of quantitative computer-based analyses by integrating document co-citation analysis, social network analysis, and exploratory factor analysis to explore the intellectual structure of the MSiSE literature (i.e. the relationships within and between subfields of MSiSE). Co-citation refers to any two articles that are jointly referenced in other articles. After the computation of co-citation analysis, 27 articles that have been co-cited at least once by follow-up studies as references were identified as the final set of core articles. The whole co-citation profile of 27 cores with the 434 links was then visualized in a network through social network analysis, representing an overview for the intellectual structure of core MSiSE studies. The most cross-referenced underpinnings in the network focused on adaptive scaffolding for self-regulated learning to enhance students’ conceptual understanding and on younger students’ metacognition in online science inquiry learning environments. Furthermore, two emerging topics in the network were identified through an exploratory factor analysis as “non-technological metacognitive scaffolding media,” and “behavior patterns & task analysis in technology-infused environments.” Overall, the study provides an innovative review method of scholarly communication in the MSiSE literature.

KW - Document co-citation analysis

KW - Exploratory factor analysis

KW - Literature review

KW - Metacognitive scaffolding in science education (MSiSE)

KW - Social network analysis

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84961144835&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84961144835&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/s10763-015-9696-4

DO - 10.1007/s10763-015-9696-4

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:84961144835

VL - 14

SP - 249

EP - 262

JO - International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education

JF - International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education

SN - 1571-0068

IS - 2

ER -