The impact of subliminal effect images in voluntary vs. stimulus-driven actions

Solène Le Bars, Yi-Fang Hsu, Florian Waszak

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

4 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

According to the ideomotor theory, actions are represented in terms of their sensory effects. In the current study we tested whether subliminal effect images influence action control (1) at early and/or late preparatory stages of (2) voluntary actions or stimulus-driven actions (3) with or without Stimulus-Response (S-R) compatibility. In Experiment 1, participants were presented at random with 50% of S-R compatible stimulus-driven action trials and 50% of voluntary action trials. The actions’ effects (i.e. up- or down-pointing arrows) were presented subliminally before each action (i.e. a keypress). In voluntary actions, participants selected more often the action congruent with the prime when it was presented at long intervals before the action. Moreover they responded faster in prime-congruent than in prime-incongruent trials when primes were presented at short intervals before the action. In Experiment 2, participants were only presented with stimulus-driven action trials, with or without S-R compatibility. In stimulus-driven action trials with S-R compatibility (e.g., left-pointing arrow signaling a left keypress), subliminal action-effects did not generate any significant effect on RTs or error rates. On the other hand, in stimulus-driven action trials without S-R compatibility (e.g., letter “H” signaling a left keypress), participants were significantly faster in prime-congruent trials when primes were presented at the shortest time interval before the action. These results suggest that subliminal effect images facilitate voluntary action preparation on an early and a late level. Stimulus-driven action preparation is influenced on a late level only, and only if there is no compatibility between the stimulus and the motor response, that is when the response is not automatically triggered by the common properties existing between the stimulus and the required action.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)6-15
Number of pages10
JournalCognition
Volume156
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2016 Nov 1

Fingerprint

stimulus
Subliminal
Stimulus
action theory
common property
experiment
Compatibility

Keywords

  • Action stages
  • Effect representation
  • Ideomotor principle
  • Stimulus-driven action
  • Stimulus-response compatibility
  • Subliminal priming
  • Voluntary action

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology
  • Language and Linguistics
  • Developmental and Educational Psychology
  • Linguistics and Language
  • Cognitive Neuroscience

Cite this

The impact of subliminal effect images in voluntary vs. stimulus-driven actions. / Le Bars, Solène; Hsu, Yi-Fang; Waszak, Florian.

In: Cognition, Vol. 156, 01.11.2016, p. 6-15.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Le Bars, Solène ; Hsu, Yi-Fang ; Waszak, Florian. / The impact of subliminal effect images in voluntary vs. stimulus-driven actions. In: Cognition. 2016 ; Vol. 156. pp. 6-15.
@article{fe2b5265fa1748ed9c97c054a0db4a0e,
title = "The impact of subliminal effect images in voluntary vs. stimulus-driven actions",
abstract = "According to the ideomotor theory, actions are represented in terms of their sensory effects. In the current study we tested whether subliminal effect images influence action control (1) at early and/or late preparatory stages of (2) voluntary actions or stimulus-driven actions (3) with or without Stimulus-Response (S-R) compatibility. In Experiment 1, participants were presented at random with 50{\%} of S-R compatible stimulus-driven action trials and 50{\%} of voluntary action trials. The actions’ effects (i.e. up- or down-pointing arrows) were presented subliminally before each action (i.e. a keypress). In voluntary actions, participants selected more often the action congruent with the prime when it was presented at long intervals before the action. Moreover they responded faster in prime-congruent than in prime-incongruent trials when primes were presented at short intervals before the action. In Experiment 2, participants were only presented with stimulus-driven action trials, with or without S-R compatibility. In stimulus-driven action trials with S-R compatibility (e.g., left-pointing arrow signaling a left keypress), subliminal action-effects did not generate any significant effect on RTs or error rates. On the other hand, in stimulus-driven action trials without S-R compatibility (e.g., letter “H” signaling a left keypress), participants were significantly faster in prime-congruent trials when primes were presented at the shortest time interval before the action. These results suggest that subliminal effect images facilitate voluntary action preparation on an early and a late level. Stimulus-driven action preparation is influenced on a late level only, and only if there is no compatibility between the stimulus and the motor response, that is when the response is not automatically triggered by the common properties existing between the stimulus and the required action.",
keywords = "Action stages, Effect representation, Ideomotor principle, Stimulus-driven action, Stimulus-response compatibility, Subliminal priming, Voluntary action",
author = "{Le Bars}, Sol{\`e}ne and Yi-Fang Hsu and Florian Waszak",
year = "2016",
month = "11",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.cognition.2016.07.005",
language = "English",
volume = "156",
pages = "6--15",
journal = "Cognition",
issn = "0010-0277",
publisher = "Elsevier",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - The impact of subliminal effect images in voluntary vs. stimulus-driven actions

AU - Le Bars, Solène

AU - Hsu, Yi-Fang

AU - Waszak, Florian

PY - 2016/11/1

Y1 - 2016/11/1

N2 - According to the ideomotor theory, actions are represented in terms of their sensory effects. In the current study we tested whether subliminal effect images influence action control (1) at early and/or late preparatory stages of (2) voluntary actions or stimulus-driven actions (3) with or without Stimulus-Response (S-R) compatibility. In Experiment 1, participants were presented at random with 50% of S-R compatible stimulus-driven action trials and 50% of voluntary action trials. The actions’ effects (i.e. up- or down-pointing arrows) were presented subliminally before each action (i.e. a keypress). In voluntary actions, participants selected more often the action congruent with the prime when it was presented at long intervals before the action. Moreover they responded faster in prime-congruent than in prime-incongruent trials when primes were presented at short intervals before the action. In Experiment 2, participants were only presented with stimulus-driven action trials, with or without S-R compatibility. In stimulus-driven action trials with S-R compatibility (e.g., left-pointing arrow signaling a left keypress), subliminal action-effects did not generate any significant effect on RTs or error rates. On the other hand, in stimulus-driven action trials without S-R compatibility (e.g., letter “H” signaling a left keypress), participants were significantly faster in prime-congruent trials when primes were presented at the shortest time interval before the action. These results suggest that subliminal effect images facilitate voluntary action preparation on an early and a late level. Stimulus-driven action preparation is influenced on a late level only, and only if there is no compatibility between the stimulus and the motor response, that is when the response is not automatically triggered by the common properties existing between the stimulus and the required action.

AB - According to the ideomotor theory, actions are represented in terms of their sensory effects. In the current study we tested whether subliminal effect images influence action control (1) at early and/or late preparatory stages of (2) voluntary actions or stimulus-driven actions (3) with or without Stimulus-Response (S-R) compatibility. In Experiment 1, participants were presented at random with 50% of S-R compatible stimulus-driven action trials and 50% of voluntary action trials. The actions’ effects (i.e. up- or down-pointing arrows) were presented subliminally before each action (i.e. a keypress). In voluntary actions, participants selected more often the action congruent with the prime when it was presented at long intervals before the action. Moreover they responded faster in prime-congruent than in prime-incongruent trials when primes were presented at short intervals before the action. In Experiment 2, participants were only presented with stimulus-driven action trials, with or without S-R compatibility. In stimulus-driven action trials with S-R compatibility (e.g., left-pointing arrow signaling a left keypress), subliminal action-effects did not generate any significant effect on RTs or error rates. On the other hand, in stimulus-driven action trials without S-R compatibility (e.g., letter “H” signaling a left keypress), participants were significantly faster in prime-congruent trials when primes were presented at the shortest time interval before the action. These results suggest that subliminal effect images facilitate voluntary action preparation on an early and a late level. Stimulus-driven action preparation is influenced on a late level only, and only if there is no compatibility between the stimulus and the motor response, that is when the response is not automatically triggered by the common properties existing between the stimulus and the required action.

KW - Action stages

KW - Effect representation

KW - Ideomotor principle

KW - Stimulus-driven action

KW - Stimulus-response compatibility

KW - Subliminal priming

KW - Voluntary action

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84979220362&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84979220362&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.cognition.2016.07.005

DO - 10.1016/j.cognition.2016.07.005

M3 - Article

VL - 156

SP - 6

EP - 15

JO - Cognition

JF - Cognition

SN - 0010-0277

ER -