The force output of handle and pedal in different bicycle-riding postures

Chia Hsiang Chen, Yu Kuang Wu, Ming Sheng Chan, Yo Shih, Tzyy-Yuang Shiang

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

3 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to analyse the force output of handle and pedal as well as the electromyography (EMG) of lower extremity in different cycling postures. Bilateral pedalling asymmetry indices of force and EMG were also determined in this study. Twelve healthy cyclists were recruited for this study and tested for force output and EMG during steady state cycling adopting different pedalling and handle bar postures. The standing posture increased the maximal stepping torque (posture 1: 204.2 47.0 Nm; posture 2: 212.5 46.1 Nm; posture 3: 561.5 143.0 Nm; posture 4: 585.5 139.1 Nm), stepping work (posture 1: 655.2 134.6 Nm; posture 2: 673.2 116.3 Nm; posture 3: 1852.3 394.4 Nm; posture 4: 1911.3 432.9 Nm), and handle force (posture 1: 16.6 3.6 N; posture 2: 16.4 3.6 N; posture 3: 26.5 8.2 N; posture 4: 41.4 11.1 N), as well as muscle activation (posture 1: 13.6-25.1%; posture 2: 13.0-23.9%; posture 3: 23.6-61.8%; posture 4: 22.5-65.8%) in the erector spine, rectus femoris, tibialis anterior, and soleus. However, neither a sitting nor a standing riding posture affected the hamstring. The riding asymmetry was detected between the right and left legs only in sitting conditions. When a cyclist changes posture from sitting to standing, the upper and lower extremities are forced to produce more force output because of the shift in body weight. These findings suggest that cyclists can switch between sitting and standing postures during competition to increase cycling efficiency in different situations. Furthermore, coaches and trainers can modify sitting and standing durations to moderate cycling intensity, without concerning unbalanced muscle development.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)54-66
Number of pages13
JournalResearch in Sports Medicine
Volume24
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2016 Jan 2

Fingerprint

Posture
Foot
Electromyography
Lower Extremity
Muscle Development
Quadriceps Muscle

Keywords

  • biomechanics
  • exercise
  • kinesiology

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Orthopedics and Sports Medicine
  • Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation

Cite this

The force output of handle and pedal in different bicycle-riding postures. / Chen, Chia Hsiang; Wu, Yu Kuang; Chan, Ming Sheng; Shih, Yo; Shiang, Tzyy-Yuang.

In: Research in Sports Medicine, Vol. 24, No. 1, 02.01.2016, p. 54-66.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Chen, Chia Hsiang ; Wu, Yu Kuang ; Chan, Ming Sheng ; Shih, Yo ; Shiang, Tzyy-Yuang. / The force output of handle and pedal in different bicycle-riding postures. In: Research in Sports Medicine. 2016 ; Vol. 24, No. 1. pp. 54-66.
@article{e7518a46b1f449b0a5a5582453c32a29,
title = "The force output of handle and pedal in different bicycle-riding postures",
abstract = "The purpose of this study was to analyse the force output of handle and pedal as well as the electromyography (EMG) of lower extremity in different cycling postures. Bilateral pedalling asymmetry indices of force and EMG were also determined in this study. Twelve healthy cyclists were recruited for this study and tested for force output and EMG during steady state cycling adopting different pedalling and handle bar postures. The standing posture increased the maximal stepping torque (posture 1: 204.2 47.0 Nm; posture 2: 212.5 46.1 Nm; posture 3: 561.5 143.0 Nm; posture 4: 585.5 139.1 Nm), stepping work (posture 1: 655.2 134.6 Nm; posture 2: 673.2 116.3 Nm; posture 3: 1852.3 394.4 Nm; posture 4: 1911.3 432.9 Nm), and handle force (posture 1: 16.6 3.6 N; posture 2: 16.4 3.6 N; posture 3: 26.5 8.2 N; posture 4: 41.4 11.1 N), as well as muscle activation (posture 1: 13.6-25.1{\%}; posture 2: 13.0-23.9{\%}; posture 3: 23.6-61.8{\%}; posture 4: 22.5-65.8{\%}) in the erector spine, rectus femoris, tibialis anterior, and soleus. However, neither a sitting nor a standing riding posture affected the hamstring. The riding asymmetry was detected between the right and left legs only in sitting conditions. When a cyclist changes posture from sitting to standing, the upper and lower extremities are forced to produce more force output because of the shift in body weight. These findings suggest that cyclists can switch between sitting and standing postures during competition to increase cycling efficiency in different situations. Furthermore, coaches and trainers can modify sitting and standing durations to moderate cycling intensity, without concerning unbalanced muscle development.",
keywords = "biomechanics, exercise, kinesiology",
author = "Chen, {Chia Hsiang} and Wu, {Yu Kuang} and Chan, {Ming Sheng} and Yo Shih and Tzyy-Yuang Shiang",
year = "2016",
month = "1",
day = "2",
doi = "10.1080/15438627.2015.1126276",
language = "English",
volume = "24",
pages = "54--66",
journal = "Research in Sports Medicine",
issn = "1543-8627",
publisher = "Taylor and Francis Ltd.",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - The force output of handle and pedal in different bicycle-riding postures

AU - Chen, Chia Hsiang

AU - Wu, Yu Kuang

AU - Chan, Ming Sheng

AU - Shih, Yo

AU - Shiang, Tzyy-Yuang

PY - 2016/1/2

Y1 - 2016/1/2

N2 - The purpose of this study was to analyse the force output of handle and pedal as well as the electromyography (EMG) of lower extremity in different cycling postures. Bilateral pedalling asymmetry indices of force and EMG were also determined in this study. Twelve healthy cyclists were recruited for this study and tested for force output and EMG during steady state cycling adopting different pedalling and handle bar postures. The standing posture increased the maximal stepping torque (posture 1: 204.2 47.0 Nm; posture 2: 212.5 46.1 Nm; posture 3: 561.5 143.0 Nm; posture 4: 585.5 139.1 Nm), stepping work (posture 1: 655.2 134.6 Nm; posture 2: 673.2 116.3 Nm; posture 3: 1852.3 394.4 Nm; posture 4: 1911.3 432.9 Nm), and handle force (posture 1: 16.6 3.6 N; posture 2: 16.4 3.6 N; posture 3: 26.5 8.2 N; posture 4: 41.4 11.1 N), as well as muscle activation (posture 1: 13.6-25.1%; posture 2: 13.0-23.9%; posture 3: 23.6-61.8%; posture 4: 22.5-65.8%) in the erector spine, rectus femoris, tibialis anterior, and soleus. However, neither a sitting nor a standing riding posture affected the hamstring. The riding asymmetry was detected between the right and left legs only in sitting conditions. When a cyclist changes posture from sitting to standing, the upper and lower extremities are forced to produce more force output because of the shift in body weight. These findings suggest that cyclists can switch between sitting and standing postures during competition to increase cycling efficiency in different situations. Furthermore, coaches and trainers can modify sitting and standing durations to moderate cycling intensity, without concerning unbalanced muscle development.

AB - The purpose of this study was to analyse the force output of handle and pedal as well as the electromyography (EMG) of lower extremity in different cycling postures. Bilateral pedalling asymmetry indices of force and EMG were also determined in this study. Twelve healthy cyclists were recruited for this study and tested for force output and EMG during steady state cycling adopting different pedalling and handle bar postures. The standing posture increased the maximal stepping torque (posture 1: 204.2 47.0 Nm; posture 2: 212.5 46.1 Nm; posture 3: 561.5 143.0 Nm; posture 4: 585.5 139.1 Nm), stepping work (posture 1: 655.2 134.6 Nm; posture 2: 673.2 116.3 Nm; posture 3: 1852.3 394.4 Nm; posture 4: 1911.3 432.9 Nm), and handle force (posture 1: 16.6 3.6 N; posture 2: 16.4 3.6 N; posture 3: 26.5 8.2 N; posture 4: 41.4 11.1 N), as well as muscle activation (posture 1: 13.6-25.1%; posture 2: 13.0-23.9%; posture 3: 23.6-61.8%; posture 4: 22.5-65.8%) in the erector spine, rectus femoris, tibialis anterior, and soleus. However, neither a sitting nor a standing riding posture affected the hamstring. The riding asymmetry was detected between the right and left legs only in sitting conditions. When a cyclist changes posture from sitting to standing, the upper and lower extremities are forced to produce more force output because of the shift in body weight. These findings suggest that cyclists can switch between sitting and standing postures during competition to increase cycling efficiency in different situations. Furthermore, coaches and trainers can modify sitting and standing durations to moderate cycling intensity, without concerning unbalanced muscle development.

KW - biomechanics

KW - exercise

KW - kinesiology

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84961198485&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84961198485&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1080/15438627.2015.1126276

DO - 10.1080/15438627.2015.1126276

M3 - Article

VL - 24

SP - 54

EP - 66

JO - Research in Sports Medicine

JF - Research in Sports Medicine

SN - 1543-8627

IS - 1

ER -