The effects of computerized inquiry-stage-dependent argumentation assistance on elementary students' science process and argument construction skills

C. H. Lin, C. H. Chiu, C. C. Hsu, T. I. Wang, C. H. Chen

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

6 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

This study proposed a computerized inquiry-stage-dependent argumentation assistance and investigated whether this can help improve elementary students' performance in science processes and the construction of quality arguments. Various argumentation assistances were developed and incorporated into each stage of scientific inquiry in a computer-supported scientific inquiry system. A nonequivalent quasi-experimental design was adopted to evaluate the effectiveness of this approach. Two intact sixth grade classes (N = 55) participated in this study, and each student used a tablet computer to accomplish the designated inquiry activities. One class of students was arranged to use the stage-dependent argumentation assistance, and the other used a generic text-based interface. The findings indicate that students who used the stage-dependent argumentation assistance could acquire significantly better science process and argument construction skills than those using the generic text-based interface.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)279-292
Number of pages14
JournalJournal of Computer Assisted Learning
Volume34
Issue number3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2018 Jun

Keywords

  • argument construction
  • elementary students
  • science process skill
  • scientific inquiry

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Education
  • Computer Science Applications

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'The effects of computerized inquiry-stage-dependent argumentation assistance on elementary students' science process and argument construction skills'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this