Abstract
To understand the impact of drinking and driving laws on drinking and driving fatality rates, this study explored the different effects these laws have on areas with varying severity rates for drinking and driving. Unlike previous studies, this study employed quantile regression analysis. Empirical results showed that policies based on local conditions must be used to effectively reduce drinking and driving fatality rates; that is, different measures should be adopted to target the specific conditions in various regions. For areas with low fatality rates (low quantiles), people's habits and attitudes toward alcohol should be emphasized instead of transportation safety laws because "preemptive regulations" are more effective. For areas with high fatality rates (or high quantiles), "ex-post regulations" are more effective, and impact these areas approximately 0.01% to 0.05% more than they do areas with low fatality rates.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 4628-4644 |
| Number of pages | 17 |
| Journal | International journal of environmental research and public health |
| Volume | 10 |
| Issue number | 10 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 2013 Sept 27 |
UN SDGs
This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
-
SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being
Keywords
- Alcohol-related traffic fatalities
- Policies
- Quantile regression analysis
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- Pollution
- Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
- Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'The effectiveness of drinking and driving policies for different alcohol-related fatalities: A quantile regression analysis'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Standard
- Harvard
- Vancouver
- Author
- BIBTEX
- RIS