TY - JOUR
T1 - The design and implementation of a meaningful learning-based evaluation method for ubiquitous learning
AU - Huang, Yueh Min
AU - Chiu, Po Sheng
AU - Liu, Tzu Chien
AU - Chen, Tzung Shi
N1 - Funding Information:
This work is supported by National Science Council , Taiwan under grant NSC 97-2511-S-006-001-MY3 , NSC 98-2628-S-008-001-MY3 , NSC 99-2631-S-011-002 , and NSC 99-2631-S-006-001 .
PY - 2011/12
Y1 - 2011/12
N2 - If ubiquitous learning (u-learning) is to be effectively developed and feasibly applied to education, it is necessary to evaluate its effectiveness. Yet to achieve a sound evaluation, a particular paradigm must be employed to fit the problem domain. Toward this end, the authors of this study have adopted a meaningful learning paradigm. Meaningful learning is often regarded as the ultimate learning status for a learner, regardless of the learning environment. Interestingly, several characteristics of u-learning are also linked to attributes of meaningful learning. For example, both u-learning and meaningful learning emphasize the authentic and active of the learning activity. Therefore, it is important to investigate the applicability of a meaningful learning paradigm for evaluating the efficacy of u-learning. The method proposed here evaluates u-learning along both macro and micro aspects, and in an effort to make u-learning more sustainable. By employing a case study, we demonstrate the feasibility of our approach by showing the advantages and disadvantages that are common to both u-learning and meaningful learning. Moreover, we also provide suggestions for instructors and designers so that they can promote the quality of u-learning.
AB - If ubiquitous learning (u-learning) is to be effectively developed and feasibly applied to education, it is necessary to evaluate its effectiveness. Yet to achieve a sound evaluation, a particular paradigm must be employed to fit the problem domain. Toward this end, the authors of this study have adopted a meaningful learning paradigm. Meaningful learning is often regarded as the ultimate learning status for a learner, regardless of the learning environment. Interestingly, several characteristics of u-learning are also linked to attributes of meaningful learning. For example, both u-learning and meaningful learning emphasize the authentic and active of the learning activity. Therefore, it is important to investigate the applicability of a meaningful learning paradigm for evaluating the efficacy of u-learning. The method proposed here evaluates u-learning along both macro and micro aspects, and in an effort to make u-learning more sustainable. By employing a case study, we demonstrate the feasibility of our approach by showing the advantages and disadvantages that are common to both u-learning and meaningful learning. Moreover, we also provide suggestions for instructors and designers so that they can promote the quality of u-learning.
KW - Elementary education
KW - Evaluation methodologies
KW - Pedagogical issues
KW - Ubiquitous learning
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=79960656196&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=79960656196&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.compedu.2011.05.023
DO - 10.1016/j.compedu.2011.05.023
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:79960656196
SN - 0360-1315
VL - 57
SP - 2291
EP - 2302
JO - Computers and Education
JF - Computers and Education
IS - 4
ER -