TY - JOUR
T1 - Technology-supported Learning in Secondary and Undergraduate Biological Education
T2 - Observations from Literature Review
AU - Lee, Silvia Wen Yu
AU - Tsai, Chin Chung
N1 - Funding Information:
Acknowledgments This study was supported by the National Science Council, under grant numbers NSC100-2628-S-018-001-MY3, NSC99-2511-S-011-005-MY3.
PY - 2013/4
Y1 - 2013/4
N2 - We conducted a literature review of using educational technology in biology learning from 2001 to 2010. A total of 36 empirical articles were included for review. Based upon the content analyses of these studies, such as technologies utilized, student sample, biological topics involved, the research purpose, and methodology, the following observations were revealed. Among the different types of technologies, the majority of studies utilized simulations or visualization tools. Genetics and molecular biology were the most popular biological topics. Most studies examined students' conceptual outcomes, fewer studies examined affective outcomes, and a few studies examined higher-order skills. Also a small number of studies observed students' learning processes. Beyond simply the comparison for traditional teaching versus technology-assisted learning, some studies emphasized comparing different technologies or different representations. This review also suggested some future research directions. For example, more studies should use technologies for interdisciplinary training and for fostering problem-solving skills.
AB - We conducted a literature review of using educational technology in biology learning from 2001 to 2010. A total of 36 empirical articles were included for review. Based upon the content analyses of these studies, such as technologies utilized, student sample, biological topics involved, the research purpose, and methodology, the following observations were revealed. Among the different types of technologies, the majority of studies utilized simulations or visualization tools. Genetics and molecular biology were the most popular biological topics. Most studies examined students' conceptual outcomes, fewer studies examined affective outcomes, and a few studies examined higher-order skills. Also a small number of studies observed students' learning processes. Beyond simply the comparison for traditional teaching versus technology-assisted learning, some studies emphasized comparing different technologies or different representations. This review also suggested some future research directions. For example, more studies should use technologies for interdisciplinary training and for fostering problem-solving skills.
KW - Biology learning
KW - Educational technology
KW - Literature review
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84874990500&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84874990500&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1007/s10956-012-9388-6
DO - 10.1007/s10956-012-9388-6
M3 - Review article
AN - SCOPUS:84874990500
SN - 1059-0145
VL - 22
SP - 226
EP - 233
JO - Journal of Science Education and Technology
JF - Journal of Science Education and Technology
IS - 2
ER -