Abstract
This discussion article addresses issues related to expansion of the Wechsler model from four to five factors; multiple broad CHC abilities measured by the Arithmetic subtest; advantages and disadvantages of including complex tasks requiring integration of multiple broad abilities when measuring intelligence; limitations of factor analysis, which constrain test developers to creating specific broad and narrow abilities as opposed to integrative tasks; implications from brain imaging research showing the critical role of neurological pathways that integrate brain regions; close relationship of the fluid reasoning factor to g, and the inadequacies of factor analytically driven statistical definitions of g in the development of improved models of intelligence. In this rejoinder to the commentaries in this special issue on structural models of the WAIS-IV and WISC-IV, the advantages and disadvantages of Schmid-Leiman's transformation, which removes the effects of g on the broad abilities, and the use of nested or bifactor models in evaluating models of intelligence are also discussed.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 235-243 |
| Number of pages | 9 |
| Journal | Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment |
| Volume | 31 |
| Issue number | 2 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 2013 Apr |
Keywords
- CHC
- WAIS-IV
- WISC-IV
- arithmetic
- factor structure
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- Education
- Clinical Psychology
- General Psychology