Switching assessment strategy during a contest: fighting in killifish Kryptolebias marmoratus

Yuying Hsu, Shih Pin Lee, Meng Hsin Chen, Shi Yi Yang, Kuang Chou Cheng

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

73 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

To determine whether animals assess each other's fighting ability in contests, researchers usually regress contest duration over the sizes of the contestants. The predominant trend in recent studies is for the contest duration to correlate positively with the size of the smaller opponent but to have no obvious relationship with the size of the larger opponent. This indicates that animals make contest decisions based on their own abilities ('self assessment') and displaces the once-popular belief that they assess their opponents ('mutual assessment'). These tests, however, are based on the implicit but never stated assumption that animals adopt only one assessment approach throughout an entire contest. By examining the contest behaviours of a killifish, we show that (1) the fish adopt mutual assessment at earlier stages when deciding whether to escalate the contest from the mutual display to the attack phase and (2) once a contest is escalated, the fish switch to self assessment to decide how long to escalate. Our results show that individuals may adopt multiple assessment approaches in one contest; contest behaviours in different stages (where applicable) of a contest should be analysed separately to better elucidate animal contest assessment strategies.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1641-1649
Number of pages9
JournalAnimal Behaviour
Volume75
Issue number5
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2008 May 1

Fingerprint

fighting
self assessment
animal
animals
duration
fish
researchers
Kryptolebias marmoratus
testing

Keywords

  • animal contests
  • decision making
  • fighting ability
  • killifish
  • Kryptolebias marmoratus
  • mutual assessment
  • self assessment

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics
  • Animal Science and Zoology

Cite this

Switching assessment strategy during a contest : fighting in killifish Kryptolebias marmoratus. / Hsu, Yuying; Lee, Shih Pin; Chen, Meng Hsin; Yang, Shi Yi; Cheng, Kuang Chou.

In: Animal Behaviour, Vol. 75, No. 5, 01.05.2008, p. 1641-1649.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Hsu, Yuying ; Lee, Shih Pin ; Chen, Meng Hsin ; Yang, Shi Yi ; Cheng, Kuang Chou. / Switching assessment strategy during a contest : fighting in killifish Kryptolebias marmoratus. In: Animal Behaviour. 2008 ; Vol. 75, No. 5. pp. 1641-1649.
@article{851a5b9fa1f145e39735c49d67b241d3,
title = "Switching assessment strategy during a contest: fighting in killifish Kryptolebias marmoratus",
abstract = "To determine whether animals assess each other's fighting ability in contests, researchers usually regress contest duration over the sizes of the contestants. The predominant trend in recent studies is for the contest duration to correlate positively with the size of the smaller opponent but to have no obvious relationship with the size of the larger opponent. This indicates that animals make contest decisions based on their own abilities ('self assessment') and displaces the once-popular belief that they assess their opponents ('mutual assessment'). These tests, however, are based on the implicit but never stated assumption that animals adopt only one assessment approach throughout an entire contest. By examining the contest behaviours of a killifish, we show that (1) the fish adopt mutual assessment at earlier stages when deciding whether to escalate the contest from the mutual display to the attack phase and (2) once a contest is escalated, the fish switch to self assessment to decide how long to escalate. Our results show that individuals may adopt multiple assessment approaches in one contest; contest behaviours in different stages (where applicable) of a contest should be analysed separately to better elucidate animal contest assessment strategies.",
keywords = "animal contests, decision making, fighting ability, killifish, Kryptolebias marmoratus, mutual assessment, self assessment",
author = "Yuying Hsu and Lee, {Shih Pin} and Chen, {Meng Hsin} and Yang, {Shi Yi} and Cheng, {Kuang Chou}",
year = "2008",
month = "5",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.anbehav.2007.10.017",
language = "English",
volume = "75",
pages = "1641--1649",
journal = "Animal Behaviour",
issn = "0003-3472",
publisher = "Academic Press Inc.",
number = "5",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Switching assessment strategy during a contest

T2 - fighting in killifish Kryptolebias marmoratus

AU - Hsu, Yuying

AU - Lee, Shih Pin

AU - Chen, Meng Hsin

AU - Yang, Shi Yi

AU - Cheng, Kuang Chou

PY - 2008/5/1

Y1 - 2008/5/1

N2 - To determine whether animals assess each other's fighting ability in contests, researchers usually regress contest duration over the sizes of the contestants. The predominant trend in recent studies is for the contest duration to correlate positively with the size of the smaller opponent but to have no obvious relationship with the size of the larger opponent. This indicates that animals make contest decisions based on their own abilities ('self assessment') and displaces the once-popular belief that they assess their opponents ('mutual assessment'). These tests, however, are based on the implicit but never stated assumption that animals adopt only one assessment approach throughout an entire contest. By examining the contest behaviours of a killifish, we show that (1) the fish adopt mutual assessment at earlier stages when deciding whether to escalate the contest from the mutual display to the attack phase and (2) once a contest is escalated, the fish switch to self assessment to decide how long to escalate. Our results show that individuals may adopt multiple assessment approaches in one contest; contest behaviours in different stages (where applicable) of a contest should be analysed separately to better elucidate animal contest assessment strategies.

AB - To determine whether animals assess each other's fighting ability in contests, researchers usually regress contest duration over the sizes of the contestants. The predominant trend in recent studies is for the contest duration to correlate positively with the size of the smaller opponent but to have no obvious relationship with the size of the larger opponent. This indicates that animals make contest decisions based on their own abilities ('self assessment') and displaces the once-popular belief that they assess their opponents ('mutual assessment'). These tests, however, are based on the implicit but never stated assumption that animals adopt only one assessment approach throughout an entire contest. By examining the contest behaviours of a killifish, we show that (1) the fish adopt mutual assessment at earlier stages when deciding whether to escalate the contest from the mutual display to the attack phase and (2) once a contest is escalated, the fish switch to self assessment to decide how long to escalate. Our results show that individuals may adopt multiple assessment approaches in one contest; contest behaviours in different stages (where applicable) of a contest should be analysed separately to better elucidate animal contest assessment strategies.

KW - animal contests

KW - decision making

KW - fighting ability

KW - killifish

KW - Kryptolebias marmoratus

KW - mutual assessment

KW - self assessment

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=42049091211&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=42049091211&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.anbehav.2007.10.017

DO - 10.1016/j.anbehav.2007.10.017

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:42049091211

VL - 75

SP - 1641

EP - 1649

JO - Animal Behaviour

JF - Animal Behaviour

SN - 0003-3472

IS - 5

ER -