Surveying and modelling China high school students’ experience of and preferences for twenty-first-century learning and their academic and knowledge creation efficacy

Chai Ching Sing, Jyh Chong Liang*, Chin Chung Tsai, Yan Dong

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

13 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

This study adapted a questionnaire design to survey six identified core dimensions of twenty-first-century learning among China high school students. The core dimensions are learning processes that include collaborative learning, self-directed learning, meaningful learning with ICT; and higher order thinking processes including critical thinking, creative thinking and authentic problem-solving. In addition, the survey includes two subscales that measure students’ efficacy for knowledge creation and academic learning as dependent variables. The survey results indicate that students expressed clear preferences for twenty-first-century learning, but their actual experiences are significantly below their preferences. All twenty-first-century learning subscales are significantly associated with their knowledge creation and academic efficacy. In addition, the structural equation models provide evidence that the learning processes predict the thinking processes and consequently the students’ efficacies. The findings imply that high school students desire more twenty-first-century learning. Teachers and educators should, therefore, foster these dimensions of twenty-first-century learning through thoughtful pedagogical design.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)658-675
Number of pages18
JournalEducational Studies
Volume46
Issue number6
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2020 Nov 1

Keywords

  • 21st-century learning
  • high school students
  • perception of learning practices
  • self-efficacy

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Education

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Surveying and modelling China high school students’ experience of and preferences for twenty-first-century learning and their academic and knowledge creation efficacy'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this