TY - JOUR
T1 - Students’ perceptions of physical magnetic models and immersive virtual reality for chemistry learning
AU - Ungu, Dewi Ayu Kencana
AU - Won, Mihye
AU - Matovu, Henry
AU - Hernandez-Alvarado, Ricardo Bruno
AU - Treagust, David F.
AU - Mocerino, Mauro
AU - Tasker, Roy
AU - Tsai, Chin Chung
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2025 Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group.
PY - 2025
Y1 - 2025
N2 - Physical magnetic models and immersive virtual reality (iVR) both support students’ grasp of abstract chemistry concepts, yet the distinct affordances of each remain underexplored. In this qualitative study, forty undergraduate chemistry students (twenty pairs) completed learning activities on hydrogen bonds using both magnetic models and iVR. Pre/post semi-structured interviews were transcribed and analysed using a cross-case thematic analysis, beginning with inductive coding and followed by deductive mapping to existing literature. Four themes emerged–visualisation, interactivity, narrative (task design), and social features–highlighting the features of magnetic models and iVR that shape students’ learning experiences. Students reported that the magnetic model activity supported tactile exploration that helped them understand basic molecular concepts like attraction and repulsion. While it offers opportunities to test hypotheses, the magnetic model activity felt individualistic. In contrast, students saw iVR as a collaborative environment where complex tasks, advanced 3D visualisation, and interactivity deepened their understanding of hydrogen bonds. These findings highlight students’ distinct perceptions of each tool–magnetic models are effective for tactile, individual explorations, and iVR is valuable for collaboration, problem-solving, and visualising complex structures. Educators should leverage these differing affordances when designing learning experiences to support students’ understanding of scientific concepts.
AB - Physical magnetic models and immersive virtual reality (iVR) both support students’ grasp of abstract chemistry concepts, yet the distinct affordances of each remain underexplored. In this qualitative study, forty undergraduate chemistry students (twenty pairs) completed learning activities on hydrogen bonds using both magnetic models and iVR. Pre/post semi-structured interviews were transcribed and analysed using a cross-case thematic analysis, beginning with inductive coding and followed by deductive mapping to existing literature. Four themes emerged–visualisation, interactivity, narrative (task design), and social features–highlighting the features of magnetic models and iVR that shape students’ learning experiences. Students reported that the magnetic model activity supported tactile exploration that helped them understand basic molecular concepts like attraction and repulsion. While it offers opportunities to test hypotheses, the magnetic model activity felt individualistic. In contrast, students saw iVR as a collaborative environment where complex tasks, advanced 3D visualisation, and interactivity deepened their understanding of hydrogen bonds. These findings highlight students’ distinct perceptions of each tool–magnetic models are effective for tactile, individual explorations, and iVR is valuable for collaboration, problem-solving, and visualising complex structures. Educators should leverage these differing affordances when designing learning experiences to support students’ understanding of scientific concepts.
KW - Immersive virtual reality (iVR)
KW - molecular visualisation
KW - physical molecular models
KW - students’ perceptions
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/105019792435
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/105019792435#tab=citedBy
U2 - 10.1080/09500693.2025.2574523
DO - 10.1080/09500693.2025.2574523
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:105019792435
SN - 0950-0693
JO - International Journal of Science Education
JF - International Journal of Science Education
ER -