Stroop interference is the result of comparable, not of differential processing speeds of two stimulus dimensions

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    3 Citations (Scopus)

    Abstract

    On a digit-counting Stroop task, processing of the slower, nonverbal, i.e., number, dimension was slowed further by a large-number set (6 to 9), as compared with a small-number set (1 to 4). In the task, neutral symbols or conflicting digits were arranged on a horizontal line (e.g., @, 444) and on two separate sheets. Each sheet contained 120 stimulus arrays. Subjects counted out loud the number of symbols or digits in each array, and their counting times for each sheet were recorded. 23 subjects received the small-number set while 21 received the large-number set. It was found that counting a large number of symbols took significantly longer time (by 162 sec. per 120 stimulus arrays) than counting a small number of symbols. Moreover, interference was nonexistent (2 msec, per stimulus array) when a large number of conflicting digits were counted but was of a typical magnitude (110 msec, per stimulus array) when a small number of conflicting digits were counted. This suggests that Stroop interference is better explained as the result of comparable, not of differential, processing speeds of the two stimulus dimensions. Implications for the cause and the locus of Stroop interference are discussed.

    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)375-380
    Number of pages6
    JournalPerceptual and Motor Skills
    Volume87
    Issue number1
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 1998 Jan 1

    ASJC Scopus subject areas

    • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology
    • Sensory Systems

    Cite this

    @article{8b41379f180d471e95c9bdd0abdf9416,
    title = "Stroop interference is the result of comparable, not of differential processing speeds of two stimulus dimensions",
    abstract = "On a digit-counting Stroop task, processing of the slower, nonverbal, i.e., number, dimension was slowed further by a large-number set (6 to 9), as compared with a small-number set (1 to 4). In the task, neutral symbols or conflicting digits were arranged on a horizontal line (e.g., @, 444) and on two separate sheets. Each sheet contained 120 stimulus arrays. Subjects counted out loud the number of symbols or digits in each array, and their counting times for each sheet were recorded. 23 subjects received the small-number set while 21 received the large-number set. It was found that counting a large number of symbols took significantly longer time (by 162 sec. per 120 stimulus arrays) than counting a small number of symbols. Moreover, interference was nonexistent (2 msec, per stimulus array) when a large number of conflicting digits were counted but was of a typical magnitude (110 msec, per stimulus array) when a small number of conflicting digits were counted. This suggests that Stroop interference is better explained as the result of comparable, not of differential, processing speeds of the two stimulus dimensions. Implications for the cause and the locus of Stroop interference are discussed.",
    author = "Chen, {Jenn Yeu}",
    year = "1998",
    month = "1",
    day = "1",
    doi = "10.2466/pms.1998.87.1.375",
    language = "English",
    volume = "87",
    pages = "375--380",
    journal = "Perceptual and Motor Skills",
    issn = "0031-5125",
    publisher = "Ammons Scientific Ltd",
    number = "1",

    }

    TY - JOUR

    T1 - Stroop interference is the result of comparable, not of differential processing speeds of two stimulus dimensions

    AU - Chen, Jenn Yeu

    PY - 1998/1/1

    Y1 - 1998/1/1

    N2 - On a digit-counting Stroop task, processing of the slower, nonverbal, i.e., number, dimension was slowed further by a large-number set (6 to 9), as compared with a small-number set (1 to 4). In the task, neutral symbols or conflicting digits were arranged on a horizontal line (e.g., @, 444) and on two separate sheets. Each sheet contained 120 stimulus arrays. Subjects counted out loud the number of symbols or digits in each array, and their counting times for each sheet were recorded. 23 subjects received the small-number set while 21 received the large-number set. It was found that counting a large number of symbols took significantly longer time (by 162 sec. per 120 stimulus arrays) than counting a small number of symbols. Moreover, interference was nonexistent (2 msec, per stimulus array) when a large number of conflicting digits were counted but was of a typical magnitude (110 msec, per stimulus array) when a small number of conflicting digits were counted. This suggests that Stroop interference is better explained as the result of comparable, not of differential, processing speeds of the two stimulus dimensions. Implications for the cause and the locus of Stroop interference are discussed.

    AB - On a digit-counting Stroop task, processing of the slower, nonverbal, i.e., number, dimension was slowed further by a large-number set (6 to 9), as compared with a small-number set (1 to 4). In the task, neutral symbols or conflicting digits were arranged on a horizontal line (e.g., @, 444) and on two separate sheets. Each sheet contained 120 stimulus arrays. Subjects counted out loud the number of symbols or digits in each array, and their counting times for each sheet were recorded. 23 subjects received the small-number set while 21 received the large-number set. It was found that counting a large number of symbols took significantly longer time (by 162 sec. per 120 stimulus arrays) than counting a small number of symbols. Moreover, interference was nonexistent (2 msec, per stimulus array) when a large number of conflicting digits were counted but was of a typical magnitude (110 msec, per stimulus array) when a small number of conflicting digits were counted. This suggests that Stroop interference is better explained as the result of comparable, not of differential, processing speeds of the two stimulus dimensions. Implications for the cause and the locus of Stroop interference are discussed.

    UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0032134318&partnerID=8YFLogxK

    UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0032134318&partnerID=8YFLogxK

    U2 - 10.2466/pms.1998.87.1.375

    DO - 10.2466/pms.1998.87.1.375

    M3 - Article

    C2 - 9760673

    AN - SCOPUS:0032134318

    VL - 87

    SP - 375

    EP - 380

    JO - Perceptual and Motor Skills

    JF - Perceptual and Motor Skills

    SN - 0031-5125

    IS - 1

    ER -