Special education for intellectual disability: Current trends and perspectives

James M. Kauffman, Li-Yu Hung

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

15 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: To inform readers of current issues in special education for individuals with intellectual disabilities and summarize recent research and opinion. RECENT FINDINGS: Two issues dominate special education for students with intellectual disabilities in the early 21st century. First, what should be taught to such students and who should teach them? Second, where should such students be taught - in 'inclusive' settings alongside normal peers or in special settings dedicated to their special needs? Research on teaching reading, arithmetic, and functional daily living skills to students with disabilities suggests the superiority of direct, systematic instruction. Universal design is often seen as supportive of inclusion. Inclusion has been seen as the central issue in special education but is gradually giving way to concern for what students learn. SUMMARY: Direct, systematic instruction in reading, arithmetic, and daily living skills is the most effective approach to teaching students with intellectual disabilities. Basic concepts and logic suggest that special and general education cannot be equivalent. We conclude that what students are taught should be put ahead of where they are taught. Our fundamental concern is that students with intellectual disabilities be respected and be taught all they can learn.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)452-456
Number of pages5
JournalCurrent Opinion in Psychiatry
Volume22
Issue number5
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2009 Sep 1

Fingerprint

Special Education
Intellectual Disability
Students
Reading
Teaching
Research

Keywords

  • Effective instruction
  • Inclusive education
  • Special education

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Psychiatry and Mental health

Cite this

Special education for intellectual disability : Current trends and perspectives. / Kauffman, James M.; Hung, Li-Yu.

In: Current Opinion in Psychiatry, Vol. 22, No. 5, 01.09.2009, p. 452-456.

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

@article{65351f86dc954dd69a93c22ef71f32ef,
title = "Special education for intellectual disability: Current trends and perspectives",
abstract = "PURPOSE OF REVIEW: To inform readers of current issues in special education for individuals with intellectual disabilities and summarize recent research and opinion. RECENT FINDINGS: Two issues dominate special education for students with intellectual disabilities in the early 21st century. First, what should be taught to such students and who should teach them? Second, where should such students be taught - in 'inclusive' settings alongside normal peers or in special settings dedicated to their special needs? Research on teaching reading, arithmetic, and functional daily living skills to students with disabilities suggests the superiority of direct, systematic instruction. Universal design is often seen as supportive of inclusion. Inclusion has been seen as the central issue in special education but is gradually giving way to concern for what students learn. SUMMARY: Direct, systematic instruction in reading, arithmetic, and daily living skills is the most effective approach to teaching students with intellectual disabilities. Basic concepts and logic suggest that special and general education cannot be equivalent. We conclude that what students are taught should be put ahead of where they are taught. Our fundamental concern is that students with intellectual disabilities be respected and be taught all they can learn.",
keywords = "Effective instruction, Inclusive education, Special education",
author = "Kauffman, {James M.} and Li-Yu Hung",
year = "2009",
month = "9",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1097/YCO.0b013e32832eb5c3",
language = "English",
volume = "22",
pages = "452--456",
journal = "Current Opinion in Psychiatry",
issn = "0951-7367",
publisher = "Lippincott Williams and Wilkins",
number = "5",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Special education for intellectual disability

T2 - Current trends and perspectives

AU - Kauffman, James M.

AU - Hung, Li-Yu

PY - 2009/9/1

Y1 - 2009/9/1

N2 - PURPOSE OF REVIEW: To inform readers of current issues in special education for individuals with intellectual disabilities and summarize recent research and opinion. RECENT FINDINGS: Two issues dominate special education for students with intellectual disabilities in the early 21st century. First, what should be taught to such students and who should teach them? Second, where should such students be taught - in 'inclusive' settings alongside normal peers or in special settings dedicated to their special needs? Research on teaching reading, arithmetic, and functional daily living skills to students with disabilities suggests the superiority of direct, systematic instruction. Universal design is often seen as supportive of inclusion. Inclusion has been seen as the central issue in special education but is gradually giving way to concern for what students learn. SUMMARY: Direct, systematic instruction in reading, arithmetic, and daily living skills is the most effective approach to teaching students with intellectual disabilities. Basic concepts and logic suggest that special and general education cannot be equivalent. We conclude that what students are taught should be put ahead of where they are taught. Our fundamental concern is that students with intellectual disabilities be respected and be taught all they can learn.

AB - PURPOSE OF REVIEW: To inform readers of current issues in special education for individuals with intellectual disabilities and summarize recent research and opinion. RECENT FINDINGS: Two issues dominate special education for students with intellectual disabilities in the early 21st century. First, what should be taught to such students and who should teach them? Second, where should such students be taught - in 'inclusive' settings alongside normal peers or in special settings dedicated to their special needs? Research on teaching reading, arithmetic, and functional daily living skills to students with disabilities suggests the superiority of direct, systematic instruction. Universal design is often seen as supportive of inclusion. Inclusion has been seen as the central issue in special education but is gradually giving way to concern for what students learn. SUMMARY: Direct, systematic instruction in reading, arithmetic, and daily living skills is the most effective approach to teaching students with intellectual disabilities. Basic concepts and logic suggest that special and general education cannot be equivalent. We conclude that what students are taught should be put ahead of where they are taught. Our fundamental concern is that students with intellectual disabilities be respected and be taught all they can learn.

KW - Effective instruction

KW - Inclusive education

KW - Special education

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=68949103726&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=68949103726&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1097/YCO.0b013e32832eb5c3

DO - 10.1097/YCO.0b013e32832eb5c3

M3 - Review article

C2 - 19561503

AN - SCOPUS:68949103726

VL - 22

SP - 452

EP - 456

JO - Current Opinion in Psychiatry

JF - Current Opinion in Psychiatry

SN - 0951-7367

IS - 5

ER -