Social Validity of Evidence-Based Practices and Emerging Interventions in Autism

Kevin Callahan, Heather L. Hughes, Smita Mehta, Karen A. Toussaint, Susan M. Nichols, Phoenix S. Ma, Metehan Kutlu, Hui Ting Wang

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

19 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Although social validation of the goals, methods, and outcomes of evidence-based practices (EBPs) in autism treatment is a significant factor in their selection and effective use, EBPs are typically identified on the basis of the technical soundness of research without consideration of social validity. The authors investigated EBPs and emerging treatments identified by the National Autism Center (NAC) and National Professional Development Center on Autism Spectrum Disorders (NPDC) to determine which interventions have evidence of social validity, and the types of social validation addressed. A review of 828 articles cited by the NAC and NPDC determined that only 221 articles (26.7%) demonstrated direct evidence of the measurement of social validation. Of seven social validity categories analyzed, only consumer satisfaction, clinically significant behavioral change, and socially important dependent variables were consistently reported. A list of EBPs with varying levels of social and empirical validation is presented, and implications for future research are discussed.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)188-197
Number of pages10
JournalFocus on Autism and Other Developmental Disabilities
Volume32
Issue number3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2017 Sep 1

Fingerprint

Evidence-Based Practice
Autistic Disorder
Research

Keywords

  • applied behavior analysis
  • autism
  • autism spectrum disorder
  • evidence-based practices
  • social validation
  • special education

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Pediatrics, Perinatology, and Child Health
  • Neurology
  • Clinical Neurology
  • Cognitive Neuroscience
  • Psychiatry and Mental health

Cite this

Social Validity of Evidence-Based Practices and Emerging Interventions in Autism. / Callahan, Kevin; Hughes, Heather L.; Mehta, Smita; Toussaint, Karen A.; Nichols, Susan M.; Ma, Phoenix S.; Kutlu, Metehan; Wang, Hui Ting.

In: Focus on Autism and Other Developmental Disabilities, Vol. 32, No. 3, 01.09.2017, p. 188-197.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Callahan, Kevin ; Hughes, Heather L. ; Mehta, Smita ; Toussaint, Karen A. ; Nichols, Susan M. ; Ma, Phoenix S. ; Kutlu, Metehan ; Wang, Hui Ting. / Social Validity of Evidence-Based Practices and Emerging Interventions in Autism. In: Focus on Autism and Other Developmental Disabilities. 2017 ; Vol. 32, No. 3. pp. 188-197.
@article{bf1c4a3821924633ad390c66bd80ed86,
title = "Social Validity of Evidence-Based Practices and Emerging Interventions in Autism",
abstract = "Although social validation of the goals, methods, and outcomes of evidence-based practices (EBPs) in autism treatment is a significant factor in their selection and effective use, EBPs are typically identified on the basis of the technical soundness of research without consideration of social validity. The authors investigated EBPs and emerging treatments identified by the National Autism Center (NAC) and National Professional Development Center on Autism Spectrum Disorders (NPDC) to determine which interventions have evidence of social validity, and the types of social validation addressed. A review of 828 articles cited by the NAC and NPDC determined that only 221 articles (26.7{\%}) demonstrated direct evidence of the measurement of social validation. Of seven social validity categories analyzed, only consumer satisfaction, clinically significant behavioral change, and socially important dependent variables were consistently reported. A list of EBPs with varying levels of social and empirical validation is presented, and implications for future research are discussed.",
keywords = "applied behavior analysis, autism, autism spectrum disorder, evidence-based practices, social validation, special education",
author = "Kevin Callahan and Hughes, {Heather L.} and Smita Mehta and Toussaint, {Karen A.} and Nichols, {Susan M.} and Ma, {Phoenix S.} and Metehan Kutlu and Wang, {Hui Ting}",
year = "2017",
month = "9",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1177/1088357616632446",
language = "English",
volume = "32",
pages = "188--197",
journal = "Focus on Autism and Other Developmental Disabilities",
issn = "1088-3576",
publisher = "SAGE Publications Ltd",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Social Validity of Evidence-Based Practices and Emerging Interventions in Autism

AU - Callahan, Kevin

AU - Hughes, Heather L.

AU - Mehta, Smita

AU - Toussaint, Karen A.

AU - Nichols, Susan M.

AU - Ma, Phoenix S.

AU - Kutlu, Metehan

AU - Wang, Hui Ting

PY - 2017/9/1

Y1 - 2017/9/1

N2 - Although social validation of the goals, methods, and outcomes of evidence-based practices (EBPs) in autism treatment is a significant factor in their selection and effective use, EBPs are typically identified on the basis of the technical soundness of research without consideration of social validity. The authors investigated EBPs and emerging treatments identified by the National Autism Center (NAC) and National Professional Development Center on Autism Spectrum Disorders (NPDC) to determine which interventions have evidence of social validity, and the types of social validation addressed. A review of 828 articles cited by the NAC and NPDC determined that only 221 articles (26.7%) demonstrated direct evidence of the measurement of social validation. Of seven social validity categories analyzed, only consumer satisfaction, clinically significant behavioral change, and socially important dependent variables were consistently reported. A list of EBPs with varying levels of social and empirical validation is presented, and implications for future research are discussed.

AB - Although social validation of the goals, methods, and outcomes of evidence-based practices (EBPs) in autism treatment is a significant factor in their selection and effective use, EBPs are typically identified on the basis of the technical soundness of research without consideration of social validity. The authors investigated EBPs and emerging treatments identified by the National Autism Center (NAC) and National Professional Development Center on Autism Spectrum Disorders (NPDC) to determine which interventions have evidence of social validity, and the types of social validation addressed. A review of 828 articles cited by the NAC and NPDC determined that only 221 articles (26.7%) demonstrated direct evidence of the measurement of social validation. Of seven social validity categories analyzed, only consumer satisfaction, clinically significant behavioral change, and socially important dependent variables were consistently reported. A list of EBPs with varying levels of social and empirical validation is presented, and implications for future research are discussed.

KW - applied behavior analysis

KW - autism

KW - autism spectrum disorder

KW - evidence-based practices

KW - social validation

KW - special education

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85028060646&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85028060646&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1177/1088357616632446

DO - 10.1177/1088357616632446

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:85028060646

VL - 32

SP - 188

EP - 197

JO - Focus on Autism and Other Developmental Disabilities

JF - Focus on Autism and Other Developmental Disabilities

SN - 1088-3576

IS - 3

ER -