Snoddy (1926) revisited: Time scales of motor learning

Shannon M. Stratton, Yeou-Teh Liu, Lee Hong Siang, Gottfried Mayer-Kress, Karl M. Newell

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

19 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The authors investigated the time scales of the learning of a mirror-tracing task to reexamine G. S. Snoddy's (1926) original claim and the received theoretical view (A. Newell & P. S. Rosenbloom, 1981) that motor learning follows a power law. Adult participants (N = 16) learned the tracing task in either a normal or a reversed visual-image condition over 5 consecutive days of practice and then performed 1 day of practice 1 week later and again 1 month later. The reversed-image group's performance was poorer than that of the normal-image group throughout the practice. An exponential was the best fitting function on individual data, but the power-law function was the best fit on the group-averaged data. The findings provided preliminary evidence that 2 characteristic time scales, (a) fast, dominated by warm-up, and (b) slow, dominated by persistent change, capture individuals' performance in the learning of the mirror-tracing task.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)503-515
Number of pages13
JournalJournal of Motor Behavior
Volume39
Issue number6
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2007 Nov 1

    Fingerprint

Keywords

  • Exponential
  • Mirror tracing
  • Motor learning
  • Power law
  • Time scales

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Biophysics
  • Orthopedics and Sports Medicine
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology
  • Cognitive Neuroscience

Cite this

Stratton, S. M., Liu, Y-T., Siang, L. H., Mayer-Kress, G., & Newell, K. M. (2007). Snoddy (1926) revisited: Time scales of motor learning. Journal of Motor Behavior, 39(6), 503-515. https://doi.org/10.3200/JMBR.39.6.503-516